张鹏辉 马增辉 马钢 屈楠 杨龙

摘要依据工程项目管理理论，从项目决策、实施及实施后3个阶段，选取21个关键性指标，综合运用层次分析法、模糊综合评价法等，采用“优、良、一般、差、极差”5个评价等级标准对阿克陶县土地开发扶贫项目实施效果及实施前后效益进行综合评价。结果表明，项目决策阶段确定的指标合理，实施阶段管理相对良好，实施后效益显著，项目实施综合效果为“良”，项目经济、生态、社会效益综合评价等级由开发前的“差”变为“良”，分值由37.09 增加到79.97，效益得到明显提升，基本实现项目的目标要求，为打赢脱贫攻坚战奠定基础。

关键词土地开发;效益评级;模型

中图分类号F301.2文献标识码A

文章编号0517-6611（2020）04-0206-04

doi：10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.04.060

開放科学（资源服务）标识码（OSID）：

Evaluation on the Implementation Effect of the Land Development Project in Poverty Alleviation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method—A Case of Akto County in Xinjiang

ZHANG Peng-hui， MA Zeng-hui， MA Gang et al（Northwest Branch of Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co.， Ltd.， Yulin， Shaanxi 719000）

AbstractAccording to the project management theory， this paper selected 21 key indicators from the three stages of project decision-making，implementation and after implementation， and comprehensively applied the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method， etc.， adopted five evaluation grade standards of “excellent， good， general， poor， very poor” to make comprehensive evaluation on the implementation effect of the land development project of Akto County andbenefits before and after the implementation. The results showed that the indicators determined in the project decision-making stage were reasonable， the management in the implementation stage was relatively good， the benefits after implementation were significant， and the comprehensive effect of project implementation was “good”. The comprehensive evaluation level of economic， ecological and social benefits of the project changed from “poor” before development to “good”，and the score increased from 37.09 to 79.97. The benefits were significantly improved and the project's target requirements were basically achieved，which laid the foundation for winning the fight against poverty.

Key wordsLand development;Benefit evaluation;Model

土地开发作为土地整治的一项重要内容，主要是对未利用的盐碱地、沙荒地、滩涂地等进行科学规划、综合开发，提高土地的质量，使其适合作物的种植。土地开发能有效增加耕地面积，提高土地利用效率。目前，国内外对于土地整治效益评价研究较多，主要集中在土地整理及土地复垦方面[1-4]，采用层次分析法（AHP）[5-6]、模糊综合评价法[7-8]、专家打分法等方法，围绕经济、社会、环境、景观效益[9-12]展开。经济效益评价方面主要集中在投资收益、产值等方面;社会效益评价方面大多集中在改善农业生产条件、农民满意度等方面;生态效益评价方面大多集中在林网密度、减少自然灾害等方面。对土地开发全过程实施效果评价方面较少。……