张克峰 吉灿忠 李社旺

摘 要：没有西方体育的“他”，也就没有民族传统体育的“我”，民族传统体育学科肇始于中西方体育文化比较。作为“他者”的西方体育，是中国传统体育学科发生和发展的动力和参照体。采用文献资料法、历史比较法，分析我们眼中作为“他者”的西方体育文化“涟漪式”结构模型，借助“涟漪式”结构模型和中国传统体育的历史文献，对民族传统体育学科内容的纳入时间和形式变化进行研究，勾画出传统体育学科“新三层涟漪式”内容结构。研究认为：民族传统体育学科内容的纳入逻辑——从西方“竞技”核心到中国的“养生”核心;当前的中国体育文化展现出“竞技-养生”文化连续统一体的形态，在“竞技-养生”文化连续统一体的两端，是“竞技”与“竞寿”的争鸣;从历史比较的视角来看，以养生为“坐标原点”的民族本位体育学科观具有扎实的历史依据。

关键词：

民族传统体育;生成逻辑;养生;连续统一体

中图分类号：G80-05

文献标识码：A

文章编号：1008-2808（2021）03-0046-06

Abstract：

Without the “other”ofwestern sports， there would be no “I” of traditional national sports， traditional national sports originated from the comparison between Chinese and western sports cultures. As the “other”， western sports is the motive force and reference body for the emergence and development of the Chinese traditional sportsdiscipline. Using the literature research， logical method， analysis of our eyes so called “the other” of the western sports culture “ripple” structure model， with the help of a “ripple” structure model and the historical documents of Chinese traditional sports， the contents of the traditional sports disciplines into the form of time and change， outlines the traditional sports discipline “new three layers of ripple type” logical structure. The research holds that the traditional national sports disciplines from the western “competitive” core to the Chinese “healthmaintenance” core， showing the “competitive - healthmaintenance” cultural continuum of the form of unity; At both ends of the cultural continuum of “competition-health maintenance preservation”， it is the contention between “competition” and “longevity competition”， From the perspective of historical comparison， the view of national standard sports discipline with health preservation as the “coordinate origin” has a solid historical basis.

Key words：

Traditional ethnic sports; Generate logic; Health; Continuous unity

對学科的研究可分为知识和制度两个维度，学科知识是学科的一种存在状态[1]，是学科制度建设的基础和依据，因此从历史逻辑视角对学科知识内容的审视是促进学科成熟的重要渠道。

从何炯的《中西体操比较说》算起，我国学者的民族传统体育学科意识已经经历了120多年。既便如此，学科建设仍受到来自内部和外部的责难和质疑。学科内部的部分人对学科性质、学科定位、学科未来等心存疑惑;学科外部人常常对其功能和属性提出非议。……