APP下载

2个粗肋草品种的再生能力比较研究

2021-03-01刘荷慧雯李季吴艳妮官敏华曾宋君吴坤林

安徽农业科学 2021年1期

刘荷慧雯 李季 吴艳妮 官敏华 曾宋君 吴坤林

摘要 以2个粗肋草品种为材料,探究和比较不同切割方式及植物生長调节剂组合对其再生能力的影响。结果表明:不同切割方式对粗肋草不定芽的增殖存在显著影响,采用单芽切割方式进行增殖培养时,不定芽的增殖效果最好,此时粗肋草No.1的增殖系数为7.15,粗肋草No.9的增殖系数为5.18。采用单芽切割方式进行增殖,粗肋草No.1的最佳增殖培养基为MS+3.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.2 mg/L TDZ+1.0 mg/L 2-IP+1.0 mg/L KT,粗肋草No.9的最佳增殖培养基为MS+2.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.1 mg/L TDZ+1.0 mg/L 2-IP+0 mg/L KT。在同一条件下,不同品种粗肋草的再生能力表现出明显差异,需要针对具体品种进行试验,筛选出其再生的最佳培养条件。

关键词 粗肋草;不定芽增殖;植物生长调节剂;切割方式

中图分类号 S682.36 文献标识码 A 文章编号 0517-6611(2021)01-0106-04

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.01.027

Abstract We used two varieties of Aglaonema commutatum to figure out and compare the effects of various cutting methods and plant growth regulators on regeneration capacity. The results showed that: effects of different cutting methods on adventitious bud multiplication were significant. Single bud was the best cutting method for bud multiplication, the multiplication coefficients of A. commutatum No.1 and Aglaonema No.9 were 7.15 and 5.18, respectively. When single bud was used for multiplication, for Aglaonema No.1, the best multiplication medium was MS+3.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.2 mg/L TDZ+1.0 mg/L 2-IP+1.0 mg/L KT, and for Aglaonema No.9 was MS+2.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.1 mg/L TDZ+1.0 mg/L 2-IP+0 mg/L KT. In the respect of regeneration capacity, different varieties of A. commutatum performed differently even with the same cultivation condition. As a result, experiments for specific varieties to filter the best cultivation condition are necessary.

Key words Aglaonema commutatum;Adventitious bud multiplication;Plant growth regulators;Cutting method

粗肋草(Aglaonema spp.)是天南星科(Araceae)粗肋草属多年生常绿观赏植物,分布于印度至马来西亚等地区[1],在我国西南和华南地区栽培较多。由于其叶形优美、叶色花纹丰富多样、四季常绿,且能耐受低湿和低光照的生长环境,易于栽培[2],广受大众喜爱,具有很高的观赏价值和经济价值。

由于粗肋草在我国开花但不结实,所以在生产上几乎不采用种子繁殖,常用分株繁殖或扦插繁殖。这2种繁殖方式容易感染病毒、繁殖系数低[3],且占用空间较大,更适合普通种植户使用[4],而不适用于大规模的工厂化生产。目前关于粗肋草的离体培养研究,已有外植体消毒、愈伤组织诱导、不定芽诱导、生根诱导等方面的相关报道。周佐葡[5]将粗肋草“如意”和“烟花”茎段诱导产生的丛生芽切成单株后接种,探究这2种粗肋草芽增殖的最佳培养基;张施君等[6]研究表明,适当浓度的6-BA有利于黄金宝玉亮丝草不定芽的增殖。……

登录APP查看全文