高飞 王华倬

摘 要：以近30年来我国中外学校体育思想史研究的文献资料为基础，运用历史研究法和逻辑分析法对我国学者学校体育思想史的研究理路进行审思。研究认为，我国学者学校体育思想史研究理路在借鉴了人物史、流派史、系统性研究范式、线索史等教育思想史研究范式，体育人物史、多元史学理论的知识框架与理论范式等体育思想史研究范式的基础上，开始转向思想史本源，并在引入全球史、后现代史、社会史等思想史研究范式后，初步形成了人物史、时代史、国别史的书写逻辑。复归到史学方法论层面，面对其存在的思想割裂、学科特性不足、全球观不足等现实问题，重构学校体育思想史研究以“学科史”“社会文化史”“元研究”为主导的未来发展趋向，对实现我国学校思想史研究的理论自觉具有理论与现实意义。

关 键 词：学校体育;学校体育思想史;研究范式;元研究

中图分类号：G807.0 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1006-7116（2021）04-0068-07

Abstract： Based on the the literature for about 30 years in the Chinese and foreign ideological history of physical education researches， using the methods of historical research and logical analysis to collate and summarize research approach on the ideological history of school physical education by Chinese scholars. We have concluded that based on drawing lessens of research paradigm from educational and ideological history including human history， school history， systematical research paradigm and clue history， and research paradigm from ideological history of physical education including sports character history， knowledge framework and theoretical paradigm of pluralistic historical theory， the research approach on the ideological history of school physical education by Chinese scholars has began to turn to the origin of ideological history; by introducing research paradigm of ideological history including global history， postmodern history and social history， that has initially formed the writing logical of the human history， the times history and the national history. Returning to the methodological layer of the history， and facing these practical problems comprising ideological fragmentation， insufficiency of discipline characteristics and global concept， via the future developmental trend mainly guided by “subject history” “social and cultural history” “meta study”， reconstructing the ideological history of school physical education may has theoretical and practical significance to realize the theoretical consciousness of the research of ideological history for Chinese schools.

Key words： school physical education;ideological history of school physical education;research paradigm;a meta study

“科學演进是前科学—常规科学—反常与危机—旧范式下的科学革命—新常规科学的动态发展历程”[1]1-2。“前科学即进入科学体系之前人类的实践经验”[2]。“一门科学如果处于前科学时期，那么这门科学是还没有形成范式的科学，之所以这样是因为这个时期关于所研究的学科基础理论学者们还没有达成共识，各种争论不休的学说依然存在着。科学范式的形成标志着该门学科已经具备了系统完整的学说体系，同时也标志着这门学科的发展进入了常规科学时期”[3]。……