赵兵

摘要：目的：对健康教育在小儿急性肠炎护理中的临床效果进行分析。方法：利用随机分组的方法选取2019年2月-2020年2月在本院接受小儿急性肠炎治疗的40例患儿参与此次研究，分成对照组与实验组，每组20例。对对照组患者实施常规护理模式，对实验组患者实施健康教育干预模式，对两组患儿接受护理模式后的治疗依从性、并发症发生情况、症状恢复时间以及住院总时间、护理满意度进行统计，分析最终的对比情况。结果：实验结果显示，两组患儿在接受了不同的护理模式后，实验组患儿与此次研究相关的各项指标结果均明显低于对照组患儿的各項指标，组间差异对比性较强，其中P<0.05。结论：对小儿急性肠炎患儿实施健康护理干预，可有效促进患儿病情的康复，降低不良反应的发生概率，提升患儿治疗依从性，值得临床上广泛进行推广应用。

关键词：健康教育;小儿;进行肠炎护理;临床效果

【中图分类号】R473.72 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1673-9026（2021）03-172-02

Abstract：Objective：to analyze the clinical effect of health education in the nursing of children with acute enteritis.Methods：40 cases of children with acute enteritis in our hospital from February 2019 to February 2020 were randomly divided into control group and experimental group，20 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were given routine nursing mode，and the patients in the experimental group were given health education intervention mode.The treatment compliance，complications，symptom recovery time，total hospitalization time and nursing satisfaction of the two groups after receiving nursing mode were statistically analyzed，and the final comparison was analyzed.Results：the experimental results showed that after the two groups of children received different nursing modes，the indicators of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group，and the differences between the two groups were relatively strong，with P < 0.05.Conclusion：the implementation of health care intervention for children with acute enteritis can effectively promote the rehabilitation of children's condition，reduce the probability of adverse reactions，and improve the treatment compliance of children，which is worthy of wide clinical application.

Key words：health education; children; enteritis nursing; clinical effect

急性肠炎是小儿最常见的一种消化科疾病，该疾病的诱发因素较多，患儿在患病时，最常见的症状就是会出现不同程度的腹泻、腹胀、呕吐等情况，严重时，患儿甚至会产生不同程度的休克以及脱水现象。而健康教育则是一种全新的护理模式，能让患儿与家属更加满意医护人员的工作，促进预后效果。本文研究主要从健康教育入手，对小儿急性肠炎的实际护理价值进行分析，现将报道分析如下：

1资料与方法

1.1一般资料

利用随机分组的方法选取2019年2月-2020年2月在本院接受小儿急性肠炎治疗的40例患儿参与此次研究，分成对照组与实验组，每组20例。其中对照组患儿男性11例，女性9例，年龄最大5岁，最小4个月，平均年龄（3.12±1.13）岁;实验组患儿男性12例，女性8例，年龄最大5岁，最小5个月，平均年龄（3.14±1.17）岁。……