范丽丽

【摘 要】目的：探究針对颅脑外伤患者采用优质护理的临床应用效果及其重要价值。方法：抽取2018年1月～2019年1月期间在我院接诊并治疗的84例颅脑外伤患者，随机分配为常规组（实施常规护理方案）和观察组（实施优质护理方案），观察对比两组患者的护理效果及护理满意度。结果：常规组患者的护理效果明显低于观察组患者（P<0.05）;观察组患者的护理满意度远高于常规组患者，两组数据对比均符合统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：针对颅脑外伤患者实施优质护理方案，患者的不良情绪得到了有效缓解，生活质量明显提升，总体护理质量良好，值得临床大力推广及借鉴。

【关键词】颅脑外伤;优质护理;护理质量;应用价值

【中图分类号】R473.6 【文献识别码】B【文章编号】1002-8714（2020）05-0032-01

【Abstract】 Objective：To explore the clinical application effect and important value of high-quality nursing for patients with traumatic brain injury. Methods Eighty-four patients with traumatic brain injury who were treated and treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were randomly assigned to the routine group （implemented a routine nursing program） and the observation group （implemented a high-quality nursing program）. Nursing effect and satisfaction of two groups of patients. Results The nursing effect of patients in the conventional group was significantly lower than that in the observation group （P <0.05）; the nursing satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was much higher than that in the conventional group， and the comparison of the two groups of data was in line with statistical significance （P <0.05）. Conclusion The implementation of high-quality nursing program for patients with traumatic brain injury has effectively alleviated the adverse emotions of patients， significantly improved the quality of life， and the overall quality of care is good， which is worthy of clinical promotion and reference.

【Keywords】 traumatic brain injury; high-quality nursing; nursing quality; application value

颅脑外伤指的是人体头部在受到外界直接或间接产生的强烈外力作用下出现的颅骨骨折、头皮裂伤等一系列临床症状，部分患者会伴随病情出现不同程度的认知功能障碍或运动障碍等[1]。此类病情具有发展迅速、致死及致残率高且预后效果不佳等特点，现阶段尚未出现相对统一的治疗方案，为努力提高患者的治疗效果，促进患者身心健康的快速恢复，保证患者充分享有优质护理服务尤为重要[2]。本文将对此展开相关调查，现汇报如下。

1 资料与方法

1.1一般资料

抽取2018年1月～2019年1月期间在我院接诊并治疗的84例颅脑外伤患者，随机分配为常规组（实施常规护理方案）和观察组（实施优质护理方案）。常规组中男女患者的比例为25：17，年龄范围22～55岁，平均年龄（38.14±2.27）岁，受伤原因：高处坠落患者8例，重物砸伤患者15例，车祸患者19例;观察组中男女患者的比例为28：14，年龄范围24～56岁，平均年龄（39.03±2.21）岁，受伤原因：高处坠落患者5例，重物砸伤患者12例，车祸患者25例。经验证两组患者的一般资料存在可比性（P>0.05）。