林艳

[摘要] 目的 评估语言沟通和心理护理干预方法使用于焦虑症患者护理过程中的运用效果。方法 便利选取2018年1月—2019年9月该医院治疗的76例焦虑症患者实施项目实验调查，开展分组时选择随机数字表法，各组38例，试验组选取一般护理+语言沟通+心理护理干预方法，对照组选取一般护理干预方法，记载各组焦虑症患者干预之前及干预之后精神状况评定结果、日常生活质量评定结果。结果 试验组干预之前精神状况评定分数（70.40±3.18）分和对照组（70.62±3.30）分相比对，差异无统计学意义（t=0.295，P>0.05）;试验组干预之后精神状况评定分数（42.85±1.20）分和对照组（67.60±2.39）分相比对减少，差异有统计学意义（t=57.049，P<0.05）;试验组干预之前日常生活质量评定分数（46.50±4.15）分和对照组（46.28±4.30）分相比，差异无统计学意义（t=0.226，P>0.05）;试验组干预之后日常生活质量评定分数（89.64±6.40）分和对照组（74.20±5.29）分相比对增多，差异有统计学意义（t=11.462，P<0.05）。结论 在焦虑症患者护理过程中使用语言沟通和心理护理干预方法展现较优效果。

[关键词] 语言沟通;心理护理;焦虑症

[Abstract] Objective To evaluate the effect of language communication and psychological nursing intervention methods in the nursing process of anxiety patients. Methods A project survey was conducted on 76 patients with anxiety disorder treated in the hospital from January 2018 to September 2019. Random number tables were convenient selected when grouping was conducted. Each group included 38 cases. The trial group selected general nursing + language communication + psychological nursing intervention method， the control group selected the general nursing intervention method， and recorded the results of mental status assessment and daily life quality assessment of patients in each group before and after intervention. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the scores of the mental condition before the intervention in the experimental group （70.40±3.18） and the score of the control group （70.62±3.30）（t=0.295， P> 0.05）. （42.85±1.20）points compared with the control group （67.60±2.39）points， the difference was statistically significant （t=57.049， P<0.05）; the test group's daily life quality assessment score before the intervention（46.50±4.15）points Compared with the control group （46.28±4.30） points， the difference was not statistically significant（t=0.226， P> 0.05）; after the intervention of the test group， the daily life quality assessment score （89.64±6.40）points and the control group （74.20±5.29） There was an increase in scores compared with pairs， and the difference was statistically significant （t=11.462， P<0.05）. Conclusion The use of language communication and psychological nursing intervention methods in the nursing process of anxiety patients shows better results.

[Key words] Language communication; Psychological nursing; Anxiety

焦慮症为十分多见的一种神经症状，患者存在一定焦虑情绪，焦虑症在女性中较为常见，为焦虑症患者实施治疗时，还需加强针对性护理服务，促使其治疗效果提升[1]。焦虑症患者多存在气急症状、心慌表现、心跳速率增加等，对其平时工作及生活带来一定干扰，病情较为严重的焦虑症患者还可能发生自杀情况等，严重损害其生命健康。因此，为焦虑症患者开展尽早治疗的基础上，还需增加一定护理干预，促使其病症好转。以下针对2018年1月—2019年9月该医院治疗的76例焦虑症患者予以指标调查分析，探究语言沟通和心理护理干预方法实施在焦虑症患者护理过程中的运用效果以及干预意义，现报道如下。