不同术式对急性外伤性硬膜下血肿临床疗效及预后的影响
2018-12-21王冰冰寿记新程森
王冰冰 寿记新 程森
[摘要] 目的 探讨颅脑损伤后急性硬膜下血肿的最佳治疗策略。 方法 回顾性分析我院2015年1月~2017年10月收治的114例ASDH患者的临床资料,按照手术方式分为血肿清除还纳骨瓣术(craniotomy,CO)组和血肿清除去骨瓣减压术(decompressive craniectomy,DC)组,分析两组患者的临床特征、术后并发症和预后。 结果 CO组66例(57.9%),DC组48例(42.1%),与CO组患者相比,DC组患者年龄较小(χ2=13.84,P<0.05),其他术前临床特点和CT扫描特征差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),DC组患者具有更高的住院死亡率、更差的预后和更多的新发血肿(P<0.05)。 结论 考虑到DC患者的术后并发症时,CO也是一种可取的治疗ASDH安全有效的手术方式,值得临床应用和推广。
[关键词] 急性硬膜下血肿;去骨瓣减压;住院死亡率;预后
[中图分类号] R651 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)25-0055-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the optimal treatment strategy for acute subdural hematoma(ASDH) after craniocerebral injury. Methods The clinical data of 114 patients with ASDH admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical procedure, the patients were divided into craniotomy (CO) group and the hematoma removal decompressive craniectomy (DC) group. The clinical features, postoperative complications and prognosis between the two groups were analyzed. Results There were 66 patients(57.9%) in the CO group and 48 patients (42.1%) in the DC group. The patients in the DC group were younger than those in the CO group (χ2=13.84, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in other preoperative clinical features and CT scan features(P>0.05). Patients in the DC group had higher hospital mortality, worse prognosis, and more new hematomas(P<0.05). Conclusion Considering CO is also a safe and effective surgical method for the treatment of ASDH in the postoperative complications of DC patients, it is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
[Key words] Acute subdural hematoma; Decompressive craniectomy; Hospital mortality; Prognosis
颅脑创伤后急性硬膜下血肿(acute subdural hematoma,ASDH) 是由桥静脉撕断或者脑挫裂伤皮质血管破裂,血液积聚在硬脑膜下腔引起,发生率为10%~30%[1]。ASDH可经保守或手术治疗,通常采取的手术方式为血肿清除去骨瓣减压术(decompressive craniectomy,DC)和血肿清除还纳骨瓣术(craniotomy,CO),然而,目前没有一级证据推荐ASDH的最佳治疗策略[2]。CO是在清除血肿之后放回骨瓣,保存颅骨的完整性,更加符合生理特点;DC是清除完血肿后进行去骨瓣减压,为肿胀的脑组织提供充足的空间,很多研究报道了DC的有效性[3],然而并非所有的患者在血肿清除后会出现严重的脑肿胀[4],因此 DC 的理论优势是值得商榷的,并且DC存在更多的術后并发症以及缺少颅骨的完整性,ASDH的最佳治疗方式仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是通过比较两组患者术前临床特征、术后并发症和预后,为ASDH患者最佳治疗策略的选择提供参考价值。现报道如下。
1 对象与方法
1.1 研究对象
选取我院2015年1月~2017年10月收治的114例ASDH经手术治疗的患者。……
