低分子肝素治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床效果及护理
2018-01-26姚丽宁杜余芬
姚丽宁+杜余芬

【摘要】 目的:探讨不稳定型心绞痛采用低分子肝素治疗的效果及整体、全面护理配合的价值。方法:选择笔者所在医院心血管内科2016年3月-2017年3月收治的不稳定型心绞痛患者100例,均采用低分子肝素治疗,观察临床效果,并随机分组,就用药期间常规护理(对照组,n=50)与整体、全面的护理配合(观察组,n=50),對预后造成的影响展开对比。结果:观察组总有效率、护理满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。硝酸甘油用量、不良反应率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:整体、全面的护理配合可显著提高总有效率,增强护理质量,确保临床安全性。
【关键词】 低分子肝素; 不稳定型心绞痛; 护理
doi:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2017.34.074 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805(2017)34-0148-02
Clinical Efficacy and Nursing Care of Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris Treated with Low Molecular Weight Heparin/YAO Lining,DU Yufen.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2017,15(34):148-149
【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin(LMWH) on unstable angina pectoris and the value of holistic and comprehensive nursing cooperation.Method:100 cases of unstable angina patients were admitted to cardiology from March 2016 to March 2017 in the authors hospital,using LMWH therapy,observed the clinical effect,the patients were randomized to medication during routine nursing(control group,n=50) with overall and comprehensive nursing care (observation group,n=50) effect on the prognosis caused by contrast.Result:The total effective rate and nursing satisfaction in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Nitroglycerin dosage and adverse reaction rate were lower than those in control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Overall and comprehensive nursing can significantly improve the total efficiency,enhance the quality of nursing and ensure the clinical safety.
【Key words】 Low Molecular Weight Heparin; Unstable angina pectoris; Nursing
First-authors address:Ningde Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University,Ningde 352100,China
不稳定型心绞痛以进行性心绞痛症状为临床主要特征,若治疗不及时,可进展为急性心肌梗死,严重威胁到患者生命安全。低分子肝素具抗血栓效果,在不稳定心绞痛治疗中作用显著,同时,用药期间注意开展整体、全面的护理干预,是最大程度改善预后的保障[1-2]。本次研究针对所选病例,就低分子肝素治疗效果及整体、全面护理配合价值展开探讨,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选择不稳定型心绞痛患者100例,均与WHO在1999年制定的相关诊断标准符合,随机分组。观察组50例,男29例,女21例,年龄46~79岁,平均(62.5±5.4)岁,;其中自发性心绞痛13例,恶化劳力型13例,初发劳力型24例;诱发因素:吸烟史10例,合并糖尿病12例,高脂血症11例,高血压17例。对照组50例,男28例,女22例,年龄45~80岁,平均(62.9±5.3)岁;其中自发性心绞痛14例,恶化劳力型12例,初发劳力型24例;诱发因素:吸烟史11例,合并糖尿病13例,高脂血症12例,高血压14例。患者对本次实验均知情……
