APP下载

关系资本与财务资本的博弈及其机制化难题

2017-09-30章铁生徐德信周蕾

安徽师范大学学报 2017年5期

章铁生+徐德信+周蕾

摘 要:雷士照明三次控制权争夺主题是关系资本与财务资本的博弈,副题则是人力资本变化如何影响关系资本的强弱。关系资本长期可以替代,需要不断维护才能强化。雷士照明创始人吴长江早期鲜活的人力资本投入,是企业创业阶段的关键资源,同时形成难以替代的关系资本,由此掌控着企业;但在维护过程中其人力资本贬值,同时不合适地把渠道关系资本作为“人质”机制,在财务资本不断进攻下,关系资本最终失去其控制力。

中图分类号:F276.5;F275.6

文献标志码:A

文章编号:10012435(2017)05062307

关键词:控制权争夺; 关系资本; 财务资本;人力资本;雷士照明

Abstract:The theme of fighting for control right in NVC for three times is a game between relational capital and financial capital, while the subtitle is how human capital changes affect the strength of relational capital. In the long run, relational capital can be replaced and needs to be continuously maintained to strengthen. Wu Changjiang, the founder of NVC, invested fresh human capital to NVC in the early time, which is the key resource of NVC's start-up stage and then it becomes a type of relational capital that is difficult to be replaced, which makes Wu the controller of NVC; but in the maintenance process, his human capital depreciated, and he regards channel relationship capital as a “hostage” mechanism inappropriately. The continuous attacks of financial capital make relational capital eventually lose its control.

理論上,公司的控制权理应归属于股权资本;实践中,控制权配置却受到诸多因素制约,其中关系资本扮演了重要的角色。雷士照明控制权争夺案例中,关系资本主要指由创始人实际拥有和控制的经销商、供应商和员工等组成的关系渠道,这种渠道资源伴随着企业建立和发展,可以作为关键资源参与企业控制权谈判。

本文选取雷士照明作为案例,原因在于:第一,不同于其他上市公司控制权争夺的保密性,雷士照明的整个斗争过程媒体都予以披露,这也为资料的可获取性和可查证性给予了前提。第二,雷士照明控制权争夺案例中,企业关系资本的建立、维护和运用呈现了非常清晰的动态图景,财务资本与关系资本的斗争也得以完整的表现,创始人吴长江三次被驱逐,两次成功回归、最终失败的传奇经历也构成了难得的单公司对比案例。……

登录APP查看全文