盐酸米诺环素与甲硝唑棒治疗牙周炎的对比分析
2016-02-05李建华
李建华
盐酸米诺环素与甲硝唑棒治疗牙周炎的对比分析
李建华
【摘要】目的 探讨盐酸米诺环素(派丽奥)与甲硝唑棒(牙康)治疗牙周炎的临床效果。方法 按照随机数字的方法将我院2015年1~12月收治的60例牙周炎患者分为两组,观察组(30例)和对照组(30例)。给予观察组患者派丽奥治疗,给予对照组患者牙康治疗,对比并分析两种治疗方法的效果。结果 观察组治疗效果优于对照组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对牙周炎患者进行派丽奥治疗,效果显著。
【关键词】派丽奥;牙康;牙周炎;疗效对比
Objective Make a research on clinical effects of minocycline hydrochloride(periocline)and metronidazole rods(yakang)in treatment of periodontitis. Methods 60 patients with periodontitis who were received and treated in hospital from January 2015 to December 2015 were picked out to study and separated them into two groups,study group(30 patients)and control group(30 patients)respectively,patients in study group were given periocline treatment,while patients in control group were given yakang treatment,and then analyze and compare treatment effects of these two treatment methods between two groups. Results Treatment efficiency in study group is much better than that in control group. Such an efficiency differential between two groups is statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion Periocline is much more effective in treatment of periodontitis compared to yakang,thus,it is good to promote and apply periocline in clinical treatment of periodontitis.
【Key words】 Periocline,Yakang,Periodontitis,Effect comparison
牙周炎是一种常见的口腔感染性疾病,中老年人群是该病的高发人群[1]。由于早期症状不明显,很多患者没有及时的接受诊断和治疗,导致症状越来越严重,甚至无法保留牙齿。控制病菌是治疗牙周炎的关键[2],本文以我院近期收治的60例牙周炎患者为研究对象,按照组别给予了他们不同的药物治疗方法,取得了较好的临床效果,具体过程如下。
1 资料和方法
1.1 一般资料
我院于2015年1~12月共收治了60例牙周炎患者,经检查,所有患者无先天性疾病和其他严重的口腔疾病,符合牙周炎的临床诊断标准。观察组患者30例,男性18例,女性12例,年龄31~65岁,平均年龄(44.3±6.5)岁,病程时间0.3~6年,平均病程时间(2.5±0.6)年。对照组患者30例,男性17例,女性13例,年龄33~66岁,平均年龄(43.6±5.4)岁,病程时间0.5~6.4年,平均病程时间(2.8±0.72)年。以上资料显示,两组患者在性别、年龄、病程时间差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),能够进行分析和对比。
1.2 方法
给予对照组患者牙康治疗。……
