李培++谭华

摘 要：以中国知网全文数据库作为数据源，对我国2001—2010年间722位体育学博士学位获得者所发表的论文及其被引数据，从H指数的角度对其个人学术论文、获得博士学位后和在读期间的科研能力进行了分析，利用Spss17.0软件对不同阶段H指数与博士学位论文水平之间进行相关性和因子分析。统计结果显示博士阶段的教育对科研能力提升有较大的促进作用，博士生在读期间H指数提升较为明显，H指数高低基本反映了博士学位论文质量；另外，博士毕业后H指数呈现两极分化，有近1/4获得博士学位后的H指数为0，反映了读博士的不同目的和动机。此外，还对使用H指数评价科研能力提出具体建议。

关 键 词：体育文献计量；H指数；科研能力；体育学博士；中国

中图分类号：G80-05 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1006-7116（2014）05-0079-03

An analysis of the scientific research ability of doctors of physical education in China from the perspective of the H-index

LI Pei，TAN Hua

（School of Graduates，South China Normal University，Guangzhou 510006，China）

Abstract： By basing the data source on the full-text database of CNKI， according to theses published between 2001 and 2010 by 722 people who had received the degree of Doctor of Physical Education as well as their cited data， from the perspective of the H-index， the authors analyzed their individual academic theses as well as their scientific research ability during their college years and after they had received the doctor degree， analyzed factors and correlation between the H-index at different stages and the level of doctor degree theses by utilizing software Spss 17.0. The statistic results showed the followings： education at the doctor stage played a big role in promoting the enhancement of scientific research ability； a doctorial students H-index increased significantly during his/her college years； the magnitude of the H-index basically reflected the quality of doctor degree theses； moreover， the H-index of the doctors showed a sign of polarization after graduation， the H-index of nearly 1/4 of the doctors was 0 after they had received the doctor degree， which reflected different purposes and motives for pursuing the doctor degree. Furthermore， the authors also put forward specific suggestions for using the H-index to evaluate scientific research ability.

Key words： sports literature mentrology；H-index；scientific research ability；doctor of physical education；China

根据《中华人民共和国学位条例》，博士研究生教育旨在培养具有独立从事科学研究工作的能力，并在科学或专门技术上做出创造性成果的高层次专门人才。所以博士生既是学习者，也是研究者，在接受学术训练的同时参与科研活动，科研能力和成果是衡量博士生质量的重要维度。博士培养单位以及用人单位也普遍认为，判断博士质量的重要依据是学术能力和学术成果[1]。在学术成果中，学术论文是研究成果最普遍最基本的展示形式。从H指数（H-index）的角度对博士生不同阶段发表论文的数和论文被引用次数等进行分析，能较客观反映体育学博士生科研能力的变化，在很大程度上体现体育学博士生的培养质量。……