DOI编码：10.3969/j.issn.1674-5698.2025.04.004

引用格式：，.共识与差异：团体标准央地政策文本分析[J].标准科学，2025（4）：23-34. LIU Jun-jie， CHANG Xiao-ran. Consensus and Difference： A Textual Analysis of Central and Local Policies for Association Standards [J].Standard Science，2025 （4）：23-34.

Consensus and Difference： A Textual Analysis of Central and Local Policies for Association Standards

LIU Jun-jie CHANG Xiao-ran （School of Economics and Management， China Jiliang University）

Abstract：[Objective] Inordertocreate agoodenvironmentforpromoting thehigh-qualitydevelopment ofassociation standardsandbuildingamoderncialistuntrytisnecessarytexcavateandanalyzetheconsenusanddifferencestatus of the policiesofthecentralandlocalgovernments，withaview toproviding reference forfuture policymaking.[Methods] This paperconstructsa quantitative analysis framework for China'scentralandlocal governments fromthedimensions of policy toolsandpolicycontentsFirst，weobtainandpreprocessthetextofthepoliciesoassociationstandardsandestablish theanalysislogicofpolicytolsandthenanalyzeandidentifthecurrentsituationandcharacteristicsoftheuseofpolicy tools inthecentralgovernmentthroughcontentcoding；second，weusetheTF-IDFandLDAmodelstoidentifthedegree ofparticipationofthebusinessentityaswellastheinheritanceandinnovationof thecentralgovernment'spolicthemes in eachregionthroughthein-depthanalysisofthepolicycontent.Results]Theuseofcentralandlocalpolicytools shows anobviouscharacteristicof“heavymixing，lightonvoluntaryandcompulsory\"，butit matchesthecurrent stageof China's transformation fromgovernment-ledstandardsto government andmarketdual-ledone.Thecentralgovernmenthas macroguianceatributes inthelayout ofpolicythemes，while theregionsmatch theirowncharacteristics withdifferentiated inovationinitiativesunderthepremiseofinheritingthecentralgoverment'spolicythemes，andthefollwingproblemsae found：themiddlereachesoftheYangtzeRiver showweakparticipationofbusinessentityandlackofenterpriseparticipation， andChengdu-ChongqingandthemiddlereachesoftheYangtzeRiverareweakininheritingthecentralgovernment'sthemes. [Conclusion]Topromotethe standardizationandqualitydevelopmentofassociationstandards，allregionsshouldstrengthen thebenign interactionbetweencentralandlocalpolicies，andensurethetargetaccuracyofregionalpoliciesonthecentral policy while taking into account policy innovation.

Keywords： association standards， content analysis， policy tools， LDA model

0 引言

伴随经济全球化的深入发展，标准在支撑产业发展、规范社会治理等多方面的重要作用日益凸显\"。《国家标准化发展纲要》指出“到2025年，我国的标准供给将实现由政府主导向政府和市场并重转变”，而团体标准作为市场主导制定标准的主要类别，有利于改善我国现行标准体系中存在的标准规范落后、响应时间长等现状。因此，推进团体标准规范优质发展意义重大又势在必行。但由于团体标准现阶段存在着公认性弱、技术含金量低以及编制不规范导致的通用性差等问题，使得团体标准处于尴尬位置，难以获得行业从业者的广泛关注。要打破这一困境，实现中国标准化更高层次自主化和规范化发展，对团体标准政策层面的研究不可或缺。

同时，对政策的研究无法脱离其政策运行情境，而政策一般都在复杂、不确定性的环境下运行，此时上下级的协调成了必然举措。但是，相关研究仅侧重于各地区或中央层面的团体标准政策文本的评价分析。例如虞舒文等构建PMC政策评价指数模型对各地区政策进行量化评价并给予相应优化路径，牛娜娜对我国中央层面的团体标准化政策法规进行量化分析并对未来制定政策法规提出相应建议等。可见，现有研究对于中央和地区团体标准政策间的对比和协同缺乏关注，研究结论也缺乏对央地政策体系布局和联动效应的参考意义，遂提出以下3个问题：目前我国中央政府和地区政府出台的政策具有哪些特征？……