徐久生，管亚盟

关键词：虚拟财产;财产性利益;网络空间;法益

摘 要：盗窃罪与非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪均无法为盗窃虚拟财产行为规制提供一揽子方案。我国学者将虚拟财产分为三类。账号类虚拟财产可以作为计算机信息数据，盗窃货币类虚拟财产可以用盗窃罪进行处罚。盗窃物品类虚拟财产行为如何规制是问题解决的关键。物品类虚拟财产不是刑法认可的财产性利益，但针对其进行的盗窃行为损害了用户对网络服务的信赖利益，该利益受到了西方法治发达国家的认可，也符合网络空间运行的诉求，待时机成熟，可以制定专门刑事法律对此进行规制。

中图分类号：DF625文献标志码：A文章编号：1001-2435（2020）02-0120-09

Penalty System of Theft of Virtual Property in Cyberspace

XU Jiu-sheng，GUAN Ya-meng（School of Criminal Justice，China University of Political Science and Law，Beijing 100088，China）

Key words：virtual property;interests of property;cyberspace ;legal interest

Abstract：Neither larceny nor illegal acquisition of computer information system data can provide a package for the regulation of theft of virtual property. Chinese scholars divide virtual property into three categories. The account class virtual property can be used as the computer information data. Theft of monetary virtual property can be punished by theft.The Regulation of item Virtual property Theft is the key to solve the problem. Item Virtual property is not a property interest recognized in Criminal Law，however，the theft against them harms the users' trust interests in network services.The interests are recognized by the western rule of law developed countries，and they are also in line with the demands of the operation of cyberspace.When the time is ripe，the special criminal law can be developed to regulate it.

自网络时代开启以来，盗窃虚拟财产如何进行规制一直是刑法学者关心的重要问题。随着网络空间的形成，盗窃虚拟财产在新的网络秩序下面临新的问题，值得我们对此重新进行审视。

一、学说之争与司法现状

关于盗窃虚拟财产行为的规制路径，学界有三种观点：第一，以传统的侵害财产犯罪进行规制。持此观点的学者倾向于将虚拟财产认定为财产或者财产性利益，再根据侵害行为的不同适用具体的罪名。以陈兴良、张明楷为代表人物。1第二种观点认为，虚拟财产不具备财产的性质，究其本质不过是一堆数据代码，属于计算机信息系统数据，应当以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪或破坏计算机信息系统数据罪来规制。……