优质护理服务模式在创伤骨科护理管理中的应用效果
2019-08-09王静姜玮
王静 姜玮
【摘 要】目的:分析和探讨优质护理服务模式在创伤骨科护理管理中的临床应用效果情况。方法:选取本院骨科所收治的患者共计140例。将本次调查研究的140例患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各70例患者。为对照组患者采用骨科常规护理管理模式,为观察组患者在常规护理模式上采用优质护理服务模式。对比和分析两组患者不同护理模式下,有无护理效果方面的差异。结果:经过护理效果的对比和分析发现,观察组患者的关节活动度、疼痛缓解时间和NRS疼痛评分方面,均显著优于对照组,其差异较为明显,具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在创伤骨科积极为患者开展优质护理服务模式,可以较好地改善患者的临床指标情况,缓解患者的疼痛情况及关节活动度情况,较好地提升临床护理工作的有效性,值得在临床进行推广应用。
【关键词】优质护理服务模式;创伤骨科;护理管理;应用效果;临床治疗
Abstract:Objective To analyze and discuss the effect of high-quality nursing service model in the clinical application of orthopedic trauma nursing management. Methods:a total of 140 patients were selected. 140 patients in this study were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 70 patients in each group. The orthopedic routine nursing management model was used for the control group, and the high-quality nursing service model was used for the observation group. Comparison and analysis of the two groups of patients with different modes of care, whether the difference in nursing effect. Results:through the comparison and analysis of nursing effects, it was found that the patients in the observation group were significantly better than the control group in terms of range of motion, pain relief time and NRS pain score, with significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion in the orthopaedic trauma patients actively to carry out high-quality nursing service model, can better improve the patient's clinical indicators, relieve the patient's pain and range of motion, better improve the effectiveness of clinical nursing work, worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Key words: quality nursing service model; Trauma orthopedics; Nursing management; Application effect; Clinical treatment
【中图分类号】R73 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1005-0019(2019)15-00-02
引言:
随着临床医疗的发展,创伤骨科的临床医疗方面也渐渐与传统骨科有了一定的差异。一般来说,创伤骨科患者自身是具备着一定的特点的,往往症状严重、病情变化快、起病急,如没有积极进行治疗,会严重威胁患者生命情况。在临床骨科治疗的过程中,要为患者提供更加有效的护理,辅助患者脱离危险,走向康复[1]。临床护理工作的进行,也产生了一定的改变,将优质护理服务模式积极应用在创伤骨科也是十分重要的。本次报道就优质护理服务模式在创伤骨科护理管理中的应用效果进行研究分析。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料 选取本院骨科所收治的患者共计140例。将本次调查研究的140例患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各70例患者。……
