妊娠期糖尿病应用循证护理的效果分析
2018-09-21陈玉洁
陈玉洁
[摘要] 目的 对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)孕妇实施循证护理的临床效果进行探析。方法 将2016年5月—2017年5月该院妇产科诊治84例GDM孕妇纳入观察研究中,通过随机数字表法分成观察组和对照组,各42例;两组均给予积极治疗和干预,对照组实施常规专科护理,观察组实施循证护理,对比两组临床护理效果。结果 在护理后,两组孕妇空腹血糖(GLU)、餐后2 h血糖(2 hPG)均有改善,但观察组更优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组不良妊娠结局发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 在GDM临床治疗中,开展循证护理干预,有助于改善病情,控制和稳定血糖,提升妊娠质量,临床意义重大。
[关键词] 妊娠期糖尿病;循证护理;妊娠结局
[中图分类号] R58 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1672-4062(2018)03(b)-0015-02
Analysis of Application Effect of Evidence-based Nursing in Gestational Diabetes
CHEN Yu-jie
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Junan Maternal and Infant Healthcare Hospital, Linyi, Shandong Province, 276600 China
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effect of evidence-based nursing in gestational diabetes. Methods 84 cases of GDM delivery women diagnosed in our hospital from May 2016 to May 2017 were selected and divided into two groups with 42 cases in each, both groups used the positive therapy and intervention, and the control group used the routine special nursing, while the observation group used the evidence-based nursing, and the clinical nursing effect was compared between the two groups. Results After nursing, the GLU and 2 hPG of the two groups were improved, but the two indexes in the observation group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05), and the incidence rate of adverse gestational outcome in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The development of evidence-based nursing intervention in clinical treatment of GDM contributes to improving the disease, controlling and stabilizing the blood glucose and improving the gestational quality, and it is of great clinical significance.
[Key words]Gestational diabetes; Evidence-based nursing; Gestation outcome
GDM是育齡女性妊娠较常见的一个并发症,就是在妊娠阶段由于机体糖代谢异常引起的病症。该病不仅对孕妇健康造成很大危害,同时对围产儿造成极不利影响[1]。循证护理是基于临床科学证据、理论层面,为患者提供针对性护理干预的新模式,在临床上有着广泛、良好应用。该文主要对2016年5月—2017年5月收治的84例GDM孕妇的临床护理情况进行研究,探析循证护理的临床应用效果,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
以该院妇产科收治的84例GDM孕妇作为观察对象,采用随机数字表法分成两组,每组42例。其中,对照组:年龄25~34岁,平均(27.4±2.3)岁;初产妇33例,经产妇9例;孕周21~29周,平均(25.7±1.4)周;观察组:年龄23~35岁,平均(28.1±2.5)岁;初产妇34例,经产妇8例;孕周23~28周,平均(26.1±1.5)周。在基本信息、孕周、产次及病情等方面,两组孕妇差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具备可比性。
1.2 方法
两组孕妇均进行降糖治疗,并进行严格饮食控制、适量运动等干预;对照组实施常规护理干预,主要是病情和体征监测、健康宣教、产前检查等;……
