APP下载

新泪然联合贝复舒治疗干眼症的临床效果

2018-03-31苏利王喜梅

中外医疗 2018年1期

苏利 王喜梅

[摘要] 目的 分析新泪然联合贝复舒治疗干眼症的临床效果。 方法 方便选取2015年1月—2017年1月收治的80例干眼症患者为研究对象,随机分为两组,新泪然为对照组治疗药物,新泪然联合贝复舒为观察组患者的治疗药物,对比两组治疗效果。结果 观察组的临床治疗总有效率为97.5%,高于对照组的75.0%;两组患者治疗后的Schinmer试验结果、BUT、SAI、SRI均得到有效改善,并且觀察组显著优于对照组,对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 新泪然联合贝复舒治疗干眼症的临床效果显著,值得推广。

[关键词] 新泪然;贝复舒;干眼症

[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)01(a)-0152-03

Clinical Effect of Tears Naturale Forte Combined with BFGF Treating Xerophthalmia

SU Li, WANG Xi-mei

Ophthalmology Department, the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Suqian, Suqian, Jiangsu Province, 223800 China

[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to analyze the clinical effect of new tears combined with beibeifu in the treatment of dry eye syndrome. Methods 80 patients with dry eye admitted from January 2015 to January 2017 were conveniently selected and randomly divided into two groups. The new tears were the control group, and the new tears combined with befushu was the observation group. The treatment effect of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of clinical observation in the observation group was 97.5%, which was higher than that in the control group 75.0%. The Schinmer test results, BUT, SAI and SRI were significantly improved after treatment in both groups, and the observation group was significantly better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of new Tear combined with Beifushu for the treatment of dry eye is significant, which is worth promoting.

[Key words] Tears naturale forte; BFGF; Xerophthalmia

临床上,干眼症具有较高发病率,是常见眼病的一种,指的是因为各种原因引发的泪液异常反应,会促使患者出现一系列眼部不适症状,在病情严重的情况下,还可能导致患者失明,也可以被称为干燥性角结膜炎[1]。临床上通常会采用泪小点栓塞疗法、人工泪液代替疗法等方式对患者进行治疗,虽然能够暂时性的缓解患者各种临床症状,但是难以促使疾病彻底治愈,所以需要继续探究一种科学合理的方式对患者进行治疗[2]。研究显示,新泪然、贝复舒联合用来治疗干眼症的临床效果显著。该研究对此也进行了探究,方便选取该院2015年1月—2017年1月纳入的80例干眼症患者为研究对象,现报道如下。

1 资料与方法

1.1 一般资料

方便选取该院纳入的80例干眼症患者为研究对象,随机分为两组,观察组患者平均年龄(42.21±6.26)岁,共40例,男性28例,女性12例。对照组患者40例,平均年龄(42.05±6.12)岁,共40例,男性27例,女性13例。对比观察组与对照组基本资料,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与临床对比要求符合。……

登录APP查看全文