潘雅英　许巧玲　蔡丽辉

【摘要】 目的：探讨综合护理干预在类风湿关节炎患者中的应用效果。方法：选取笔者所在医院2016年2月-2017年2月收治的128例类风湿关节炎患者作为研究对象，分为两组，各64例，分别采用常规护理干预和综合护理干预。对比两组患者护理前后生活质量评分、护理效果和护理服务满意度。结果：两组患者护理前各项生活质量评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；经过护理后各项生活质量内容均发生改善，且试验组患者生活质量改善情况、临床治疗总有效率、护理服务满意率均优于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：在类风湿关节炎患者中应用综合护理干预效果显著，临床护理中值得推广。

【关键词】 综合护理干预； 类风湿关节炎； 应用效果

doi：10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2017.29.059 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805（2017）29-0117-03

Application of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis/PAN Ya-ying，XU Qiao-ling，CAI Li-hui.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research，2017，15（29）：117-119

【Abstract】 Objective：To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Method：128 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in our hospital from February 2016 to February 2017.They were randomly divided into control group and experimental group（64 cases）.Routine nursing intervention and comprehensive nursing intervention were used respectively.The quality of life scores，nursing outcomes and nursing service satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after nursing care.Result：There was no significant difference in the quality of life between the two groups before treatment（P>0.05）.After all the quality of life，total effective rate and the satisfaction rate of nursing service were better than those of the control group，the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）.Conclusion：The effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in rheumatoid arthritis patients is obvious，and it is worthy to be popularized in clinical nursing.

【Key words】 Comprehensive nursing intervention； Rheumatoid arthritis； Application effect

First-authors address：Ningde Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University，Ningde 352100，China

類风湿性关节炎属于一种全身性的、慢性的人体自身免疫性疾病，发病率较高且发病女性较多，确切发病机制不明，病情严重时会对身体各部位器官造成严重伤害[1]。近年来，，类风湿性关节炎的发病率不断升高，严重影响了患者的身体健康[2]。

1 资料与方法

1.1 一般资料

选取笔者所在医院2016年2月-2017年2月收治的128例类风湿关节炎患者作为研究对象，随机分为对照组和试验组，各64例，对照组男32例，女32例，年龄20～61岁，平均（44.54±5.52）岁；试验组男31例，女33例，年龄20～62岁，平均（45.24±5.75）岁。两组患者一般资料比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），有可比性。患者均自愿参与试验，本次试验符合规定。

1.2 方法

对照组进行常规护理干预，试验组则加用综合护理进行干预，具体操作如下：（1）护理人员为患者打造温馨、舒适的就诊环境，避免患者在冷色调环境下产生的情绪低落；护理人……