CT与超声诊断梗阻性黄疸的对比分析
2016-02-05王丹
王 丹
CT与超声诊断梗阻性黄疸的对比分析
王 丹
【摘要】目的 分析对比CT与超声诊断梗阻性黄疸的价值。方法 选取2015年1~12月梗阻性黄疸患者54例作为研究对象,按照不同检查方式将其分为两组。27例纳入对照组,实施超声检查;27例纳入实验组,实施CT检查。对比分析两组的诊断准确率。结果 实验组的诊断准确率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在诊断梗阻性黄疸时,CT较超声的诊断准确率较高。
【关键词】梗阻性黄疸;CT;超声;诊断
Objective Comparatively study on the value of CT and Ultrasonography in diagnosis of obstructive jaundice. Methods From January 2015 to December 2015,54 cases of patients with obstructive jaundice who were treated in hospital were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods,27 patients in control group were given ultrasonography diagnosis,while another 27 patients in study group were given CT diagnosis,and then to compare diagnosis accuracy between two groups. Results The accuracy of diagnosis in study group was much higher than that in control group,there were statistically significant differences between two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion CT is much more accurate and significant in diagnosis of obstructive jaundice than ultrasonography,thus,such a diagnosis method is quite worthwhile to be attended.
【Key words】Obstructive jaundice,CT,Ultrasonography,Diagnosis
梗阻性黄疸为常见消化科危重症,是由十二指肠乳头癌、胆总管结石、胆管癌和胆总管狭窄等所致胆管梗阻,诱发黄疸,患者可有陶土便、腹部疼痛及发热症状[1]。梗阻原发病及梗阻部位判断为临床诊断关键,逆行胆管造影为此病诊断金标准,可靠准确,但重复性较差,创伤性较大。此文选取2015年1~12月梗阻性黄疸患者54例作为研究对象,通过组间比较分析CT和超声的诊断价值,以下为具体报道。
1 资料和方法
1.1一般资料
选取2015年1~12月梗阻性黄疸患者54例作为研究对象,按照不同检查方式将其分两组。27例纳入对照组,实施超声检查,年龄:33~65岁,平均(47.47±2.16)岁,病程:30 d~5个月,平均(2.06±0.62)个月。27例纳入实验组,实施CT检查,年龄:32 ~65岁,平均(47.21±2.55)岁,病程:30 d~5.5个月,平均(2.11±0.44)个月。两组一般资料的对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
1.2方法
1.2.1对照组方法 选择西门子Sequoia512、GE Voloson730、迈瑞DC-6型彩超诊断仪,探头频率是3.5 MHz。检查时患者左侧卧位或仰卧位,由右上腹给予多切面扫查,对肝内外胆管、胰腺、胆囊和主胰管等进行探查。如有胆管扩张,需追踪到胆管远端,明确梗阻病因及部位。……
