红霉素与小剂量舒利迭治疗COPD的价值
2014-09-26王爱武
王爱武
[摘要] 目的 探讨红霉素与小剂量舒利迭治疗COPD的临床价值。 方法 选择80例患者,随机分为两组,各40例,对照组使用舒利迭每次1吸,每日2次,观察组则联合使用红霉素,1次0.25g,每日4次,同时将舒利迭每次1吸,每日1次,比较两组患者治疗后肺功能,血气分析结果及痰量及步行6min距离。 结果 治疗后观察组FVC、FEV1/预计值、FEV1/FVC及MVV均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组治疗后血气分析中各指标基本恢复正常,其中pH高于对照组(P<0.05),PaO2高于对照组(P<0.05),PaCO2低于对照组(P<0.05),观察组步行6min距离显著长于对照组(P<0.05),且24h痰量少于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论 红霉素联合舒利迭治疗COPD,能更快的改善患者肺功能,缓解患者临床症状,提高治疗效果。
[关键词] 红霉素;沙美特罗;氟替卡松;COPD
[中图分类号] R563.9 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2014)17-64-03
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical value of erythromycin combined with small dose of seretide for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods 80 cases were randomly divided into two groups, each 40 cases, control group were used seretide 1 pen each time, 2 times daily, combined with erythromycin 0.25g each time,1.0g one day, the observation group were used seretide every 1 pen a day, then lung function, blood gas results and sputum volume and walking distance in 6min were compared between the two groups after treatment. Results After treatment, the observation group with FVC, FEV1/ estimates, FEV1/FVC and MVV were higher than control group (P<0.05), the index of blood gas analysis in the basic returned to normal after treatment of pH and PaO2 were higher than control group(P<0.05), PaCO2 was lower than control group(P<0.05), walk 6min distance was longer than control group (P<0.05),24 hours with amount expectoration was less than control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Erythromycin combined with small dose of seretide for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can quickly improve pulmonary function and clinical symptoms of patients, so it can improve the therapeutic effect.
[Key words] Erythromycin; Salmeterol; Fluticasone propionate; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
慢性阻塞性肺部疾病(COPD)的实质是肺部的不可逆性异常炎症反应,目前研究提示使用β2受体激动剂(沙美特罗)与吸入糖皮质激素(氟替卡松)联合制剂舒利迭具有一定效果,但长期大剂量的使用糖皮质激素对患者尤其是老年人,容易出现骨质疏松,股骨头坏死等严重并发症[1],而随着大环内酯类药物治疗慢性气道炎症在临床得到肯定,红霉素越来越广泛的用于治疗慢阻肺患者,本研究主要探讨联合使用红霉素与小剂量舒利迭治疗COPD的临床效果,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选择2009年1月~2012年12月本门诊收治的COPD急性发作患者80例,随机分为两组,各40例,其中观察组:男24例,女16例,年龄55~81岁,平均(63.5±2.9)岁,体重指数19.0~23.5,平均(21.5±0.6),每年急性发作次数1~5次,平均(1.5±0.2)次;对照组:男25例,女15例,年龄55~80岁,平均(63.4±2.8)岁,体重指数19.1~23.6,平均(21.6±0.5),每年急性发作次数1~5次,平均(1.5±0.3)次,两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数及每年急性发作次数等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
1.2 方法
所有患者均签署知情同意书,并给与抗感染、吸氧、加强营养、维持……
