万婷

【摘要】目的：探讨对接受雾化吸入治疗的慢阻肺患者采用综合护理干预后的临床效果。方法：选取2020年5月-2021年4月于我院接受雾化吸入治疗的94例慢阻肺患者作为此次实验对象。在正式开展实验研究之前，将上述患者依据所接受护理干预措施不同分为两组，其中接受常规护理干预的47例患者组别为常规组，接受综合护理干预的47例患者组别为实验组。结果：各指标数据经统计学软件后得出：实验组患者经综合护理后的临床有效率为95.74%（45/47），较常规组80.85%（38/47）高;肺功能恢复情况较常规组好。组间对比差异显著，P值较0.05小。结论：在对接受雾化吸入治疗的慢阻肺患者实施护理干预时，引入综合护理干预措施具有积极地临床价值，建议积极普及和应用。

【关键词】雾化吸入;综合护理;慢阻肺;临床效果

Objective： To explore the clinical effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on COPD patients receiving atomization inhalation. Methods： from May 2020 to April 2021， 94 patients with COPD were selected as the subjects. Before the formal experimental study， the above-mentioned patients were divided into two groups according to the different nursing interventions， including 47 patients receiving routine nursing intervention as the routine group and 47 patients receiving comprehensive nursing intervention as the experimental group. Results： the clinical effective rate of the experimental group was 95.74% （45 / 47）， which was higher than 80.85% （38 / 47） of the conventional group; The recovery of lung function was better than that of the routine group. There was significant difference between the two groups （P < 0.05）. Conclusion： in the implementation of nursing intervention for COPD patients receiving atomization inhalation therapy， the introduction of comprehensive nursing intervention measures has positive clinical value， and it is recommended to actively popularize and apply.

[Key words] atomization inhalation; Comprehensive nursing; COPD; Clinical effect

1 资料与方法

1.1 一般资料

参与本次实验研究的94例患者均为2020年5月-2021年4月于我院接受雾化吸入治疗的慢阻肺患者。在正式开展实验研究之前，将上述患者依据所接受护理干预措施不同分为常规组和实验组，每组各47例患者。通过统计学软件对两组患者基础资料进行处理得出：常规组患者中有男性25例、女性22例，中位年龄为（64.25±3.05）岁，中位病程为（3.68±0.68）年;实验组患者中有男性26例、女性21例，中位年龄为（64.30±3.01）岁，中位病程为（3.66±0.70）年。组间对比差异不明显，即P值较0.05大，具有对比意义。

納入标准：（1）均已确诊为慢阻肺患者;（2）已在知晓本次实验研究内容基础上自愿签署同意书;（3）依从性高。

排除标准：（1）伴有其他较为严重的脏器疾病;（2）依从性差;（3）有精神或意识方面障碍。……