综合护理模式在慢性化脓性中耳炎患者围术期的应用效果观察
2019-10-21郑倩倩
郑倩倩

【摘 要】目的:分析综合护理模式在慢性化脓性中耳炎患者围术期的应用效果。方法:选取2016年12月到2018年11月期间在我院接受治疗的136位慢性化脓性中耳炎患者作为研究对象,随机分组,综合护理的68例患者作为研究组,另外68例给予常规护理作为对照组,对比护理效果。结果:研究组患者的治愈率高达97.1%(66/68),高于对照组患者的治愈情况82.4%(56/68),研究组患者的住院时间是(8.09±0.72) d,优于对照组的(13.52±0.59) d,而研究组患者对护理的满意程度高达100%,明显优于对照组的88.2%(60/68),(P<0.05)。结论:对于慢性化脓性中耳炎患者的围术期来说,专业的综合护理模式其效果优于常规护理,值得推广应用。
【关键词】综合护理模式;慢性化脓性中耳炎;围术期
【中图分类号】R473.6【文献识别码】B 【文章编号】1002-8714(2019)11-0027-01
【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the application effect of comprehensive nursing mode in perioperative period of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media. Methods A total of 136 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media who were treated in our hospital from December 2016 to November 2018 were enrolled in the study. A total of 68 patients with comprehensive nursing were enrolled in the study group, and another 68 patients received routine care as a control. Group, compare the effect of care. Results The cure rate of the study group was as high as 97.1% (66/68), which was higher than that of the control group (82.4% (56/68). The hospitalization time of the study group was (8.09±0.72) d, which was better than the control group. (13.52±0.59) d, and the satisfaction of the study group was as high as 100%, which was significantly better than that of the control group (88.2% (60/68), (P<0.05).Conclusion For the perioperative period of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media, the professional comprehensive nursing mode is better than conventional nursing and worthy of popularization and application.
【Keywords】comprehensive nursing mode; chronic suppurative otitis media; perioperative period
慢性化脓性中耳炎的特点是发病率与复发率高,常见症状是耳朵长时间流脓,鼓膜穿孔与听力下降,严重的甚至会引起颅内外的并发症,危及患者的生命安全;手术是治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎的主要手段,可以有效的缓解患者的病情,但是因为手术过后其它的因素影响,患者的恢复需要一定的时间[1-2],所以此时给予专业的综合护理干预可以获得满意的效果,本研究及以2016年12月到2018年11月期间在我院接受治疗的136位慢性化脓性中耳炎患者作为研究对象,给予不同的护理方式,以期得到预期的护理效果。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选取2016年12月到2018年11月期间在我院接受治疗的136位慢性化脓性中耳炎患者,其中68例患者作为研究组给予专业的综合护理,男30例,女38例,年龄21-62岁,平均年龄(36.52±1.02) 岁;另外68例患者作为对照组进行常规护理,男32例,女36例,年龄23-68岁,平均年龄(37.69±2.05) 岁,两组患者的其他基础数据不具有统计学差异(P>0.05),可以进行对比分析。……p>
