傅玲娜

【摘要】 目的：探讨优质护理干预降低儿科院内感染发生率的应用价值。方法：选取90例儿科患儿作为研究对象，研究时间为2017年1月-2018年12月，按照抽签方法分为两组，各45例，对照组给予一般护理，观察组给予优质护理干预，观察两组患儿院内感染发生率、护理满意度评分、护理胜任力评分。结果：观察组院内感染发生率低于对照组，观察组护理满意度评分高于对照组，观察组护理胜任力评分高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：优质护理干预应用于儿科有利于降低院内感染发生率及提高家属满意度，值得应用及推广。

【关键词】 优质护理干预; 儿科; 院内感染发生率

doi：10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2019.16.035 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805（2019）16-00-03

【Abstract】 Objective：To explore the application value of high quality nursing intervention in reducing the incidence of infection in pediatric hospitals.Method：A total of 90 children with pediatrics were selected as study subjects.The study time was from January 2017 to December 2018.They were divided into two groups according to the drawing method.The control group was given general nursing care，and the observation group was given quality nursing intervention，45 cases in each group.The incidence of nosocomial infection，nursing satisfaction score，and nursing competency score were observed in the two groups.Result：The incidence of nosocomial infection in the observation group was lower than that in the control group，the nursing satisfaction score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group，the nursing competency score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group，the differences were statistically significant（P<0.05）.Conclusion：The application of quality nursing intervention in pediatrics is beneficial to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection and improve the satisfaction of family members.It is worthy of application and promotion.

【Key words】 Quality nursing intervention; Pediatrics; Incidence of nosocomial infections

First-authors address：Dabu Peoples Hospital，Dabu 514299，China

院內感染一直是临床上较为重视的公共卫生安全问题之一，与医疗服务质量的评价具有密切相关联系，同时也会对护患纠纷发生率造成不同程度的影响，为此在临床上加强儿科管理十分重要，可对住院患儿实施相应护理干预措施，即在满足生理、心理需求的同时提供优质服务，且更好地控制院内感染[1];笔者所在医院为了探讨优质护理干预降低儿科院内感染发生率的应用价值，选取2017年1月-2018年12月收治的90例儿科患儿作为研究对象，见正文描述。

1 资料与方法

1.1 一般资料

本次选取90例儿科患儿作为研究对象，研究时间为2017年1月-2018年12月，按照抽签方法分为两组，各45例，对照组给予一般护理，观察组给予优质护理干预。观察组中男23例，女22例;年龄6个月～12岁，平均（5.77±0.85）岁。对照组中男22例，女23例;年龄7个月～12岁，平均（5.79±0.87）岁。两组患儿一般资料比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），具有可比性。患儿家属均同意参加本次研究，签署知情同意书，本研究经医院伦理委员会批准。