APP下载

SIRT1表达水平与肿瘤患者预后关系的研究

2018-05-29王一涵李龙浩方文姬重庆医科大学附属第一医院肿瘤科重庆400016

现代医药卫生 2018年10期
关键词:结果显示异质性文献

王一涵,赵 斌,李龙浩,方文姬,陈 英,张 涛(重庆医科大学附属第一医院肿瘤科,重庆400016)

恶性肿瘤是全球主要死亡原因之一,每年新发例数与死亡例数分别达到1 410万和820万[1-2],因此,寻找潜在的肿瘤生物标志物用以指导临床决策有重要意义。沉默信息调节因子1(SIRT1)是一种依赖于烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸的脱乙酰酶[3]。有研究表明,SIRT1主要通过修饰组蛋白参与细胞生长、代谢、凋亡、肿瘤发生及耐药等多种过程[4]。SIRT1 在肺癌[5]、肝癌[6]、结直肠癌[7]、淋巴瘤等多种恶性肿瘤组织中高表达[8]。SIRT1表达水平与肿瘤患者的预后有一定关联,但各研究报道结果并不完全一致。本研究拟通过meta分析评价

SIRT1在肿瘤患者预后评估中的价值。

1 材料与方法

1.1 资料

1.1.1 文献检索策略 利用计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane library数据库中从建库至2017年12月31日公开发表的关于SIRT1与肿瘤预后相关性的英文文献。检索词包括:sirtuin1、SIRT1、cancer、carcinoma、neoplasm、tumor、prognosis、outcome、survival。对相关参考文献进行扩展检索。

1.1.2 纳入与排除标准 纳入标准:(1)研究对象为病理确诊的肿瘤患者;(2)描述了SIRT1表达水平与肿瘤患者临床结局的关系。排除标准:(1)综述、案例报道、动物或细胞系研究;(2)无法获取相关临床结局指标的风险比(HR)及 95% 置信区间(CI);(3)非英文文献。如果一篇文献内包括2个及以上试验,并且报道了不同结局,将作为独立研究进行数据提取。

1.2 方法

1.2.1 资料提取 数据由2名研究者独立提取,包括:(1)文献基本信息;(2)临床信息(肿瘤类型、样本量、随访时间);(3)SIRT1 检测方法及临界值;(4)临床结局指标的HR及95%CI。

1.2.2 文献质量评价 采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对纳入文献进行质量评价。总分为9分。

1.3 统计学处理 本研究所有分析均采用Stata 12.0软件。效应量选取HR及95%CI,若文献未直接提供,按TIERNEY[9]推荐的方法计算。分析各研究间的异质性采用χ2检验,若各研究结果间存在明显异质性,则需采用亚组分析或敏感度分析探索其异质性的来源。通过漏斗图、Begg′s检验评估发表偏倚。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2 结果

2.1 文献检索结果 初步检索获得相关文献578篇。仔细阅读题目及摘要后,得到初筛文献52篇。进一步阅读全文,最终纳入英文文献[10-43]34篇,共7 311例患者。其中,文献[21,39]均可再分为2个独立研究进行数据提取及分析。文献检索流程及结果,见图1。34篇纳入文献发表于2009—2017年,均采用免疫组织化学测定SIRT1的表达。质量评分为6~8分。见表1。

图1 文献筛选流程及结果

表1 纳入研究的基本特征

续表1 纳入研究的基本特征

2.2 meta分析结果 纳入文献中,33篇文献(包含6 874例患者)报道了SIRT1表达水平与OS的关系。分析结果显示,与SIRT1低表达比较,SIRT1高表达的肿瘤患者 OS 时间缩短(HR=1.66,95%CI为 1.36~2.02,P=0.000),见图2。亚组分析结果显示,按照肿瘤类型分组,消化道肿瘤与非消化道肿瘤均显示SIRT1高表达患者 OS时间缩短(消化道肿瘤HR=1.46,95%CI为1.17~1.82,I2=75.2%;非消化道肿瘤HR=2.04,95%CI为1.38~3.00,I2=79.2%);按照 HR 计算方法分组,单变量分析组异质性明显下降(HR=1.75,95%CI为 1.33~2.29,I2=47.7%),多变量分析组仍存在明显异质性(HR=1.62,95%CI为 1.26~2.08,I2=82.4%)。

图2 SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者OS关系的meta分析森林图

纳入文献中,6篇文献(包含1 492例患者)报道了SIRT1表达水平与RFS的关系。分析结果显示,SIRT1高表达的肿瘤患者RFS时间缩短,差异有统计学意义(HR=1.71,95%CI为 1.03~2.83,P=0.039),见图 3。

图3 SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者RFS关系的meta分析森林图

纳入文献中,6篇文献(包含1570个患者)报道了SIRT1表达水平与DFS的关系。分析结果显示,SIRT1不同表达水平的肿瘤患者DFS差异无统计学意义(HR=1.23,95%CI为 0.75~2.02,P=0.419),见图 4。

图4 SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者DFS关系的meta分析森林图

2.3 发表偏倚 33篇文献报道了SIRT1表达水平与OS的关系,漏斗图显示存在发表偏倚(Begg′s test,P=0.002),见图5。采用剪补法将估计缺失的研究纳入后得到校正的合并效应量HR=1.29,95%CI为1.05~1.58,P=0.016。

图5 漏斗图检验发表偏倚

2.4 敏感度分析 SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者OS的敏感度分析结果,见图6。分析结果显示,每个单独的研究结果对总体合并效应量并无明显影响。

图6 SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者OS的敏感度分析

3 讨论

SIRT1通过赖氨酸去乙酰化作用调节靶蛋白活性,在胚胎发育、分化及维持自身平衡中发挥重要作用[44]。研究发现,SIRT1同时具有抑制肿瘤及促进肿瘤的双重作用。一方面,SIRT1可以通过维持基因稳定性从而抑制肿瘤发生[45];另一方面,SIRT1也可通过去乙酰化调节相关蛋白的活性,调控上皮间质转化,维持肿瘤干细胞存活,促进肿瘤增殖、侵袭和转移[46]。此外,SIRT1还参与肿瘤细胞获得性耐药[47]。本研究通过meta分析探讨SIRT1表达与肿瘤患者预后的关系。本研究结果显示,与SIRT1低表达肿瘤患者比较,SIRT1高表达患者OS、RFS缩短。SIRT1高表达是肿瘤预后的一个危险因素。本研究结果提示,SIRT1可能作为判断肿瘤预后的标志物及潜在的肿瘤治疗靶点,与其他抗肿瘤药物联合应用可提高治疗效果。

分析发现,研究SIRT1表达水平与肿瘤患者OS的各文献结果存在明显异质性(P=0.000,I2=77.9%)。作者展开了敏感度分析,结果显示,单一研究对总合并效应量并无明显影响。亚组分析显示肿瘤类型、HR计算方法都可能导致异质性的产生。其他因素如患者基线特征(包括年龄、肿瘤分期、分化程度等)、临界值、随访时间等方面的差异也可能是各研究异质性产生的原因。针对纳入研究存在的发表偏倚,作者采用剪补法分析得到校正的合并效应量HR=1.289,95%CI为 1.05~1.58,证实了本研究结果的可靠性。此外,meta分析结果显示,SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者低 RFS相关(P=0.039),与 DFS无关(P=0.419)。进一步分析发现,研究SIRT1与RFS相关性的文献纳入肿瘤类型包括乳腺癌(39.0%)、头颈部肿瘤(29.3%)、消化道肿瘤(18.3%)及肾癌(13.4%),其中报道的肿瘤分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者所占比例达到52.5%;而SIRT1与DFS相关性的文献纳入肿瘤类型包括乳腺癌(58.5%)及消化道肿瘤(41.5%),Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者占38.9%。结果提示,RFS、DFS与SIRT1相关性的差异可能是由肿瘤类型及分期的不同所导致。目前,仍需更多临床研究的相关数据,进一步分析SIRT1在不同肿瘤类型及不同肿瘤期别中的预后价值。

本研究仍存在一定局限性:(1)各文献中SIRT1表达水平的临界值不统一;(2)部分研究未直接提供HR值,需要通过生存曲线计算提取估计值,未能获取HR值的文献被排除;(3)报道阳性结果的研究更容易发表;(4)本研究结果可能受到某些混杂因素的影响。因此,对本研究结果的解读应更加谨慎。

综上所述,SIRT1高表达与肿瘤患者的不良预后有一定关系。随着对SIRT1作用机制的深入研究,以及更多高质量临床研究的设计及开展,SIRT1有望作为肿瘤预后标志物及潜在治疗靶点,为临床治疗提供新的思路和方法。

[1]FERLAY J,SOERJOMATARAM I,DIKSHIT R,et al.Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide:sources,methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012[J].Int J Cancer,2015,136(5):e359-386.

[2]SIEGEL RL,MILLER KD,JEMAL A.Cancer statistics,2016[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(1):7-30.

[3]郭淑芹,朱春英,张云良.SIRT1与肿瘤[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2011,38(8):596-572.

[4]SAUNDERS LR,VERDIN E.Sirtuins:critical regulators at the crossroads between cancer and aging[J].Oncogene,2007,26(37):5489-5504.

[5]GRBESA I,PAJARES MJ,MARTINEZ-TERROBA E,et al.Expression of sirtuin 1 and 2 is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients[J].PLoS ONE,2015,10(4):e0124670.

[6]CHEN J,ZHANG B,WONG N,et al.Sirtuin 1 is upregulated in a subset of hepatocellular carcinomas where it is essential for telomere maintenance and tumor cell growth[J].Cancer Res,2011,71(12):4138-4149.

[7]KRIEGL L,VIETH M,KIRCHNER T,et al.Up-regulation of c-MYC and SIRT1 expression correlates with malignant transformation in the serrated route to colorectal cancer[J].Oncotarget,2012,3(10):1182-1193.

[8]NIHAL M,AHMAD N,WOOD GS.SIRT1 is upregulated in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma,and its inhibition induces growth arrest and apoptosis[J].Cell Cycle,2014,13(4):632-640.

[9]TIERNEY JF,STEWART LA,GHERSI D,et al.Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis[J].Trials,2007,8(1):16.

[10]QIU G,LI X,WEI C,et al.The Prognostic Role of SIRT1-Autophagy Axis in Gastric Cancer[J].Dis Markers,2016,2016(6):6869415.

[11]CHEN HC,JENG YM,YUAN RH,et al.SIRT1 promotes tumorigenesis and resistance to chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and its expression predicts poor prognosis[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2012,19(6):2011-2019.

[12]CHENG F,SU L,YAO C,et al.SIRT1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in colorectal cancer by regulating Fra-1 expression[J].Cancer Lett,2016,375(2):274-283.

[13]JIN MS,HYUN CL,PARK IA,et al.SIRT1 induces tumor invasion by targeting epithelial mesenchymal transition-related pathway and is a prognostic marker in triple negative breast cancer[J].Tumour Biol,2016,37(4):4743-4753.

[14]NOSHO K,SHIMA K,IRAHARA N,et al.SIRT1 histone deacetylase expression is associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer[J].Mod Pathol,2009,22(7):922-932.

[15]ZHANG T,RONG N,CHEN J,et al.SIRT1 expression is associated with the chemotherapy response and prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC[J].PLoS One,2013,8(11):e79162.

[16]LI C,WANG L,ZHENG L,et al.SIRT1 expression is associated with poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma[J].Onco Targets Ther,2015,8(1):977-984.

[17]NOGUCHI A,LI X,KUBOTA A,et al.SIRT1 expression is associated with good prognosis for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol,2013,115(3):385-392.

[18]NOGUCHI A,KIKUCHI K,ZHENG H,et al.SIRT1 expression is associated with a poor prognosis,whereas DBC1 is associated with favorable outcomes in gastric cancer[J].Cancer Med,2014,3(6):1553-1561.

[19]JANG KY,NOH SJ,LEHWALD N,et al.SIRT1 and c-Myc promote liver tumor cell survival and predict poor survival of human hepatocellular carcinomas[J].PLoS One,2012,7(9):e45119.

[20]JUNG W,HONG KD,JUNG WY,et al.SIRT1 Expression Is Associated with Good Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer[J].Korean J Pathol,2013,47(4):332-339.

[21]SONG S,LUO M,SONG Y,et al.Prognostic role of SIRT1 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2014,24(11):849-854.

[22]WANG J,WANG C.Prognostic and Predictive Role of Sirtuin1 Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma[J].Clin Lab,2016,62(10):1989-1994.

[23]HE Z,YI J,JIN L,et al.Overexpression of Sirtuin-1 is associated with poor clinical outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J].Tumour Biol,2016,37(6):7139-7148.

[24]HAO C,ZHU PX,YANG X,et al.Overexpression of SIRT1 promotes metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma[J].BMC Cancer,2014,14(1):978.

[25]MVUNTA DH,MIYAMOTO T,ASAKA R,et al.Overexpression of SIRT1 is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Patients With Ovarian Carcinoma[J].Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol,2017,25(6):415-421.

[26]SHUANG T,WANG M,ZHOU Y,et al.Over-expression of Sirt1 contributes to chemoresistance and indicates poor prognosis in serous epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC)[J].Med Oncol,2015,32(12):260.

[27]CHUNG SY,JUNG YY,PARK IA,et al.Oncogenic role of SIRT1 associated with tumor invasion,lymph node metastasis,and poor disease-free survival in triple negative breast cancer[J].Clin Exp metastasis,2016,33(2):179-185.

[28]BENARD A,GOOSSENS-BEUMER IJ,HOESEL AQ,et al.Nuclear expression of histone deacetylases and their histone modifications predicts clinical outcome in colorectal cancer[J].Histopathology,2015,66(2):270-282.

[29]JANG SH,MIN KW,PAIK SS,et al.Loss of SIRT1 histone deacetylase expression associates with tumour progression in colorectal adenocarcinoma[J].J Clin Pathol,2012,65(8):735-739.

[30]DERR RS,HOESEL AQ,BENARD A,et al.High nuclear expression levels of histone-modifying enzymes LSD1,HDAC2 and SIRT1 in tumor cells correlate with decreased survival and increased relapse in breast cancer patients[J].BMC Cancer,2014,14(1):604.

[31]CHEN X,SUN K,JIAO S,et al.High levels of SIRT1 expression enhance tumorigenesis and associate with a poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma patients[J].Sci Rep,2014,4(1):7481.

[32]STENZINGER A,ENDRIS V,KLAUSCHEN F,et al.High SIRT1 expression is a negative prognosticator in pancreatic ductal adenocarcino-ma[J].BMC Cancer,2013,13(1):450.

[33]WU M,WEI W,XIAO X,et al.Expression of SIRT1 is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in both operable triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer[J].Med Oncol,2012,29(5):3240-3249.

[34]KIM JR,MOON YJ,KWON KS,et al.Expression of SIRT1 and DBC1 is associated with poor prognosis of soft tissue sarcomas[J].PLoS One,2013,8(9):e74738.

[35]FENG H,GUO P,WANG J,et al.Expression of Leptin and Sirtuin-1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma[J].Pathol Res Pract,2016,212(4):319-324.

[36]CHA EJ,NOH SJ,KWON KS,et al.Expression of DBC1 and SIRT1 is associated with poor prognosis of gastric carcinoma[J].Clin Cancer Res,2009,15(13):4453-4459.

[37]LEE H,KIM KR,NOH SJ,et al.Expression of DBC1 and SIRT1 is associated with poor prognosis for breast carcinoma[J].Hum Pathol,2011,42(2):204-213.

[38]CAO YW,LI WQ,WAN GX,et al.Correlation and prognostic value of SIRT1 and Notch1 signaling in breast cancer[J].J Exp Clin Cancer Res,2014,33(1):97.

[39]ZHANG S,HUANG S,DENG C,et al.Co-ordinated overexpression of SIRT1 and STAT3 is associated with poor survival outcome in gastric cancer patients[J].Oncotarget,2017,8(12):18848-18860.

[40]LV L,SHEN Z,ZHANG J,et al.Clinicopathological significance of SIRT1 expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma[J].Med Oncol,2014,31(6):965.

[41]ZHANG LH,HUANG Q,FAN XS,et al.Clinicopathological significance of SIRT1 and p300/CBP expression in gastroesophageal junction(GEJ)cancer and the correlation with E-cadherin and MLH1[J].Pathol Res Pract,2013,209(10):611-617.

[42]ZHANG W,LUO J,YANG F,et al.BRCA1 inhibits AR-mediated proliferation of breast cancer cells through the activation of SIRT1[J].Sci Rep,2016,6(1):22034.

[43]NOH SJ,KANG MJ,KIM KM,et al.Acetylation status of P53 and the expression of DBC1,SIRT1,and androgen receptor are associated with survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients[J].Pathology,2013,45(6):574-580.

[44]王鑫鑫,吴梦,周思欣,等.SIRT1与代谢及肿瘤的关系[J].山东医药,2013,53(8):90-93.

[45]马威,卢颖,毛俊,等.SIRT1基因在肿瘤中的作用机制[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2015,42(1):40-42.

[46]陈厚早,张祝琴,韦玉生,等.去乙酰化酶SIRT1的研究进展[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(3):441-447.

[47]周琰,姚阳.沉默信息调节因子1与肿瘤耐药相关研究进展[J].癌症进展,2013,11(4):345-350.

猜你喜欢

结果显示异质性文献
Meta分析中的异质性检验
18F-FDG PET/CT代谢参数及代谢异质性与胃癌临床病理特征的相关性
Hostile takeovers in China and Japan
基于可持续发展的异质性债务治理与制度完善
Cultural and Religious Context of the Two Ancient Egyptian Stelae An Opening Paragraph
融合感知差异的货代和货主选择行为异质性揭示
最严象牙禁售令
The Application of the Situational Teaching Method in English Classroom Teaching at Vocational Colleges
The Role and Significant of Professional Ethics in Accounting and Auditing
第四次大熊猫调查结果显示我国野生大熊猫保护取得新成效