长程脑电图监测在癫痫发作患者中的应用价值分析
2017-06-17施惠敏
施惠敏

【摘要】 目的 探究长程脑电图监测在癫痫发作患者中的应用价值。方法 25例癫痫发作患者, 均实施常规脑电图监测和长程脑电图监测, 比较两种监测方式在临床发作、痫样放电方面的发现率。结果 长程脑电图监测癫痫患者临床发作发现率(52.00%)高于常规脑电图监测(20.00%), 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。长程脑电图监测癫痫患者痫样放电发现率(64.00%)高于常规脑电图监测(28.00%), 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。长程脑电图监测癫痫患者同时痫样放电和临床发作的发现率(44.00%)高于常规脑电图监测(4.00%), 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 采用长程脑电图对癫痫发作患者实施监测, 能有效提高患者的确诊率, 临床应用价值较高。
【关键词】 长程脑电图监测;癫痫;诊断
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.15.013
Analysis of application value of long-range electroencephalogram monitoring in epileptic seizure patients SHI Hui-min. Zhangjiagang City First Peoples Hospital, Zhangjiagang 215600, China
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the application value of long-range electroencephalogram monitoring in epileptic seizure patients. Methods A total of 25 epileptic seizure patients all received routine and long-range electroencephalogram monitoring, and comparison were made on discovery rate of clinical seizures and epilepsy discharge by two monitoring methods. Results Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring had higher discovery rate of clinical seizures as 52.00% than 20.00% by routine electroencephalogram monitoring, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring had higher discovery rate of epilepsy discharge as 64.00% than 28.00% by routine electroencephalogram monitoring, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring had higher discovery rate of clinical seizures and epilepsy discharge at the same time in epilepsy patients as 44.00% than 4.00% by routine electroencephalogram monitoring, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring for epileptic seizure patients can effectively increase diagnosis rate, and it has higher clinical value.
【Key words】 Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring; Epilepsy; Diagnosis
癲痫是临床常见的中枢神经系统疾病之一。癫痫给患者带来躯体痛苦较为严重, 对其生活质量影响较大[1]。因而, 诊断和治疗癫痫是神经内科研究的重要课题。视频脑电图能对患者脑电波、临床发作等进行同步分析与监测, 在诊治癫痫中起到重要的作用[2]。本研究选择就诊于本院的部分癫痫发作患者为研究对象, 均实施常规脑电图和长程脑电图监测, 比较两者应用效果。现将研究结果报告如下。
1 资料与方法
1. 1 一般资料 选择2016年8~12月本院收治的癫痫发作患者25例, 其中男15例, 女10例;年龄18~66岁, 平均年龄(42.63±7.79)岁;病程2 d~14年, 平均病程(6.32±2.56)年。
1. 2 方法 所有患者均实施常规脑电图监测和长程脑电图监测。长程脑电图监测:采用natus neurology视频脑电图监测仪进行监测, 按国际10-20系统放置头皮盘状电极, 双侧耳垂为参考电极, 用火棉胶固定于头皮, 并弹力帽固定, 采取16导单、双极导联方式进行描记。于视频脑电监测中, 不给予患者任何镇静催眠药物, 其检测中需含有≥1个完整的睡眠周期。实施过度换气3 min、清醒睁闭眼、闪光刺激诱发等实验。由专职脑电图医生完成常规脑电图监测和长程脑电图监测的视频回放分析。……
