APP下载

我国运动员心理健康状态量表编制

2017-01-18李晖张忠秋

山东体育学院学报 2016年5期

李晖 张忠秋

摘要:目的:依据心理健康双因素模型,从积极心理健康和常见心理健康问题两方面入手,编制适用于我国运动员的心理健康状态量表。方法:通过文献研究与开放式问卷调查结果初步形成了运动员心理健康状态的85个项目。对80名运动员进行预测试,通过项目分析和探索性因素分析探索量表的结构。对205名运动员进行正式量表的测试,通过验证性因素分析确定出了比较合理的运动员心理健康状态结构,并编制出了运动员心理健康状态量表。此外,还选取其中40名运动员进行30天后的重测,并且采用症状自评量表(CL-90)和幸福感指数量表作为校标,对运动员心理健康状态量表进行多指标的信度与效度检验。结果:对运动员心理健康状态的研究可以从 “运动员常见心理问题”和“运动员积极心理特征”两个维度进行。其中“运动员常见心理问题”分量表包含“抑郁”、“敌对”、“焦虑”和“躯体化”四个因子;“运动员积极心理特征”分量表包含“意志品质”、“社会适应”和“积极智能”三个因子。运动员常见心理问题分量表结构模型的χ2/df < 2,GFI>0.80,CFI>0.90,RMEA<0.08;运动员积极心理特征分量表结构模型的χ2/df <2,GFI>0.90,CFI>0.90,RMEA<0.08。运动员常见心理问题分量表Cronbachα系数为0.813,重测信度为0.981;运动员积极心理特征分量表Cronbachα系数为0.615,重测信度为0.971。运动员常见心理问题分量表各因子得分与CL-90大部分因子间呈显著相关(r=0.3~0.8),运动员积极心理特征分量表结果与幸福感指数大部分因子间呈显著相关(r=0.2~0.8)。本量表总体来说各因素之间存在中等程度相关,且均低于与其所在的分量表的相关性,说明具有较好的聚合效度和辨别效度。本量表在性别和运动等级两个变量上基本不存在显著差异。结论:本研究编制的《运动员心理健康状态量表》信效度指标均较佳,可以作为适用于运动员的心理健康状态测量工具。

关键词:运动员心理健康状态量表;常见心理问题;积极心理特征

中图分类号:G804.8文献标识码:A文章编号:1006-2076(2016)05-0091-09

Abstract:Objective: According to the Dual-Factor Model of Mental ealth, Chinese Athlete Mental ealth cale was prepared in terms of common mental disorders and positive mental characteristics. Methods: Based on the overviews of former researchers and the results of the open-ended questio-nnaires, 85 items were collected. he logical structure of athlete mental health was constructed by exploring factor analysis of the 80 preliminary questionnaires and the confirmatory factor analysis of the formal scale given to 205 athletes. At last, 40 subjects randomly selected were retested 30 days later for the test-retest reliability, and by taking CL-90 and Well-being cale as criterion validity, Chinese Athlete Mental ealth cale was taken reliability analysis and validity analysis by many indexes. Results: Athlete mental health has two dimensional structures. hey are Common Mental Disorders and Positive Mental Characteristics. Common Mental Disorders includes four factors: depression, hostility, anxiety and somatization. Positive Mental Characteristics includes three factors: strong will, social adjustment and positive intelligence. he result of confirmatory factor analysis of Common Mental Disorders was indicated by χ2/df<2, GFI>0.80, CFI>0.90, RMEA<0.08; the result of confirmatory factor analysis of Positive Mental Characteristics was indicated by χ2/df<2, GFI>0.90, CFI>0.90, RMEA<0.08. he Cronbach α coefficient was 0.813 for Common Mental Disorders, and test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.918; he Cronbach α coefficient was 0.615 for Positive Mental Characteristics and test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.971. ignificant correlation (r=0.3~0.8) appeared between Common Mental Disorders and CL-90. ignificant correlation (r=0.2~0.8) appeared between Positive Mental Characteristics and Index of Well-being. Moderate correlations were present between each factor, and they were all lower than the correlations of the sub-scales. Convergent validity and discrimination validity were good for Chinese Athlete Mental ealth cale. here is no significant difference on gender and sport level. Conclusions: he scale can be regarded as fitting tool of estimating athlete mental health.

Key words: athlete mental health scale; common mental disorders; positive mental characteristics

面对不断挑战自我、超越自我的成绩目标,运动员们承受着与常人不一样的压力,遇到普通生活中不可能遇到的挑战,因此也常常会产生特定的心理健康问题。心理健康问题的出现,会扰乱运动员平稳正常地面对内外环境的发展,影响其自我潜能的发挥,损害其良好的竞技能力[1]。而在……

登录APP查看全文