客观化创造力测量工具:《中文远距联想测验》编制

李良敏1,2,罗玲玲1,刘武1

(1.东北大学科技与社会研究中心,辽宁沈阳110819;2.辽宁省交通高等专科学校学生工作处,辽宁沈阳110122)

摘要:依循Mednick远距联想测验(RAT)思路和我国台湾学者任纯慧等编制的中文远距联想测验(CRAT)的观点,并依据北京语言大学《汉语常用词词频表》,编制了符合中国大陆学生语言习惯的《中文远距联想测验》。通过预测验,对题库题目进行难度、区分度分析,选出优质题项与吴静吉等人(1999)编制的《新编创造思考测验》一起对筛选样本进行施测。施测结果表明,《中文远距联想测验》的内部一致性信度较高,Cronbach’α系数为0.734;其效标效度也较好,与《新编创造思考测验》的流畅性、变通性和独创性分数相关非常显著。该测验已被应用于大学自主招生考试,效果良好。

关键词:《中文远距联想测验》; 测验量表编制; 创造力测量

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2015.01.004

收稿日期:2014-06-20

作者简介:李良敏(1980-),女,辽宁沈阳人,东北大学博士研究生,辽宁省交通高等专科学校讲师,主要从事科学创造方法论研究;罗玲玲(1950-),女,湖南新邵人,东北大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事科学创造方法论研究;刘武(1951-),男,吉林长春人,东北大学教授,主要从事科学创造方法论研究。

中图分类号:N031

文献标志码:A

文章编号:1008-3758(2015)01-0019-06

Abstract:Based on Mednick’s remote association theory, CRAT by Ren chunhui and her colleagues from Taiwan, China and The Chinese Common Words Frequency Table by Beijing Language and Culture University, Chinese Remote Association Test suitable for the language habits of the mainland students was developed. Based on the difficulty and discrimination parameters in the pretest, the quality items were selected and used to test the screening samples together with New Creativity Test by Wu jingji et al. The results showed that Chinese Remote Association Test has a quite good internal consistency, with its Cronbach’s α being 0.734, and the test has a good criterion validity, with remarkable correlations to New Creativity Test in fluency, flexibility and originality. Chinese Remote Association Test has been used in university independent recruitment examinations and performed satisfactorily as a screening instrument.

An Objective Measuring Tool of Creativity: The Development ofChineseRemoteAssociationTest

LILiang-min1,2,LUOLing-ling1,LIUWu1

(1. Research Center of STS, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China; 2. Students’ Affairs Division, Liaoning Provincial College of Communications, Shenyang 110122, China)

Key words:ChineseRemoteAssociationTest; test scale development; creativity measurement

随着时代的发展和科学技术的进步,人类创造能力的开发越发重要,而有效的创造力测量手段是创造力开发的基础之一。目前创造力测量面临的主要困难之一是现行创造力行为测量如托兰斯创造思维测验的主观评价标准多元、过程复杂[1],难以适应大规模施测的要求。……