——————————--

构建基于公众参与的政府绩效问责机制

方俊1,曹惠民2

(1.华南理工大学公共管理学院,广东广州510641;2.中国矿业大学文法学院,江苏徐州221116)

摘要:在以实现“治理体系和治理能力现代化”为目标的行政体制改革背景下,亟需构建起以公众参与为基石的政府绩效问责机制。这一机制从内涵构成角度看,包括问责主体、问责内容、问责路径、问责的惩戒和申述机制,以及问责文化等五个方面的内容。就是要确立以公众参与为基础的多元化政府绩效问责主体,明确以公众需求为导向的政府绩效问责内容,开辟以公众参与为基础的政府绩效问责路径,建立以回应公众关切为宗旨的政府绩效问责的惩戒和申述机制,积极培育鼓励公众参与的政府绩效问责文化。

关键词:政府绩效; 问责机制; 公众参与; 问责文化; 制度创新

收稿日期:2015-01-27

基金项目:广东省社会科学规划基金资助项目(GD12CZZ01);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(13YJA810003);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2014XT07);民政部委托课题资助项目(2015MZR0252607)。

作者简介:方俊(1970-),男,湖北阳新人,华南理工大学副教授,法学博士,主要从事政府公共管理研究;曹惠民(1979-),男,河北邯郸人,中国矿业大学讲师,管理学博士,主要从事政府绩效治理研究。

中图分类号:D601

文献标志码:A

文章编号:1008-3758(2015)04-0384-06

Abstract:In the context of administrative system reform, which aims to realize the modernization of governance system and governance capability, it is of urgent need to build the government performance accountability mechanism based on public participation. From the perspective of component, accountability subject, content, path, retribution and complaint as well as culture are covered. In general, multiplex accountability subjects of government performance based on public participation should be established, the accountability contents oriented towards public demands should be clarified, the accountability path with public participation should be opened up, the accountability retribution and complaint mechanism for responding to public concerns should be built up and the government performance accountability culture with public participation should be positively cultivated.

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.04.010

Construction of Government Performance Accountability Mechanism: Based on Public Participation

FANGJun1,CAOHui-min2

(1. School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China; 2. School of Law and Politics Administration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Key words:government performance; accountability mechanism; public participation; accountability culture; institutional innovation

基于“自上而下”垂直观照路径的政府绩效管理模式一直是我国政府绩效管理的主导,它并没有摆脱“唯上”的行政传统,在实践中也就难免出现政府绩效评价无法回应社会公众的诉求,社会公众参与政府绩效评价的渠道有限、效果式微等问题。……