妇产科腹部切口脂肪液化临床治疗探讨
2015-12-02姚红芳
姚红芳

[摘要]目的 探讨和分析妇产科腹部切口脂肪液化患者的临床治疗方法以及疗效情况。方法 随机抽取2010年1月—2015年1月期间,该院妇产科收治的腹部切口脂肪液化患者70例。根据抽签法将患者划分成平局的两组,即:对照组35例,采用常规方法治疗;观察组35例,采用微波联合α-糜蛋白酶治疗,并就两组患者的临床治疗情况以及效果进行统计学比较和分析。 结果 临床对比统计显示,观察组患者的治疗时间、换药次数以及伤口愈合时间均明显少于对照组患者,且临床治疗总有效率(100.0%)和患者总满意度(97.14%)均明显高于对照组患者(80.0%,71.43%),组间对比存差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对妇产科腹部切口脂肪液化患者采用微波联合α-糜蛋白酶进行临床治疗,能够有效加快伤口愈合,促进患者恢复,提高临床疗效,因此,它是一种科学、有效、理想的临床治疗方法。[Abstract] Objective To investigate and analyze the treatment and efficacy of fat colliquation in abdominal incisions in patients in Department of Obstetrics
[关键词] 妇产科;腹部切口脂肪液化;微波;α-糜蛋白酶;临床效果
[中图分类号] R713 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)10(a)-0089-03
Clinical Treatment of Patients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Fat Liquefaction in Abdominal Incision
YAO Hong-fang
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , Changshu Zhitang People's Hospital, Changshu, Jiangsu Province, 215531 China
and Gynecology. Methods 70 patients with fat colliquation in abdominal incisions admitted to the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in this hospital between January 2010 and January 2015 were selected and divided randomly into control group (n=35) and observation group (n=35). The control group adopted conventional therapy, while the observation group was treated with microwave combined withα-Chymotrypsin. The treatment and efficacy were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The duration of treatment, frequency of dressing change, wound healing time were all shorter in the observation group than in the control group, while the total effective rate(100.0% vs 80.0%) and overall satisfaction (97.14% vs 71.43%) were all higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences above were statistically significant between the two groups, n<0.05. Conclusion Microwave combined withα-Chymotrypsin, in the treatment of patients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with fat liquefaction in abdominal incision, can accelerate wound healing, promote their recovery and improve the efficacy, therefore it is a scientific, effective and ideal regime.
[Key words] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Fat liquefaction in abdominal incision; Microwave; α- chymotrypsin; Clinical effect
腹部切口脂肪液化,是腹部手术的一种较为常见的临床并发症。它对患者的临床疗效以及术后恢复影响严重,容易造成术后感染、手术失败等问题,妇产科患者还容易造成母婴的死亡[1-2]。因此,必须要加强对腹部切口脂肪液化的临床治疗效果。该研究随机选择2010年1月—2015年1月以来,在该院妇产科进行治疗的腹部切口脂肪液化患者70例。将患者根据抽签法平均的划分成对照组和观察组两组,每组各有35例。分别采用常规方法和微波联合α-糜蛋白酶进行临床治疗,并分析、统计和比较两组患者的临床治疗情况和效果,现报道如下。endprint
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
随机抽选该院2010年1月—2015年1月之间,妇产科收治的70例腹部切口脂肪液化患者。……
