科技期刊选题组稿的路径、瓶颈及突破策略
2025-08-18于世美王艳敏杨洁孙书军
[中图分类号] G232 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1009-5853(2025)04-0055-08
Strategies of Paths,Bottlenecksand Breakthrough forTopic Selectionand OrganizationofScientificJournals
Yu ShimeiWang YanminYang Jie Sun Shujun(ScienceChinaPress,Beijing,100717)
[Abstract] Three common paths are summarized for topic selection and organization based on big data analysis,communication through conference platforms,and mobilization of editorial staff. Key bottenecks and breakthrough strategies are analyzed under these three paths.The practical experience of SClENCE CHINA Technological Sciences is summarized,and the effective contributionof topic selectionand organization to the impact factor of the journal are explored,to provide reference and inspiration for the development of peer journals.Journal editorsneed to furtherexplore and innovate,research more strategies for topic selectionand organization,strive for broader academic discourse and brand influence,and contribute to promoting technological progressand academic exchanges.
[Key words] Scientific and technical journalTopic selection and organization pathStrategy Journal influence
发表优秀的科研成果,服务于科技创新,是世界一流科技期刊的重要本质特征[1]。近年来,我国快速增强的科研竞争力与我国科技期刊总体实力不强的现状不相匹配[2][3],对此,我国出台了一系列与科技期刊出版和评价相关的重要文件和政策,促进了我国科技期刊加快发展步伐[4]。吸引优质稿源,切实提高科技期刊发表文章的学术水平,是提高科技期刊影响力的根本[5]。有针对性地选题组稿,是科技期刊吸引优质稿源、推动创新发展、塑造品牌形象、提升学术质量和国际影响力的重要措施。面对国内外同领域期刊对优质稿源的激烈竞争,如何高效地进行选题组稿,推动期刊脱颖而出,是期刊编辑需要重点思考的工作内容和掌握的工作技能。选题组稿是一个有计划的过程,编辑应充分发挥主观能动性,开拓创新,精心策划,组织高水平的优质选题。众多期刊编辑重视选题组稿工作,并将其作为提升期刊知名度和影响力的重要手段之一。《国家科学评论(英文版)》(NationalScienceReview)通过总结办刊实践,着重介绍了选题组稿的策略与成效[。《科学通报(英文版)》(ScienceBulletin)通过组约“标杆”稿件,为期刊整体影响力提升发挥了“立竿见影”的效果[7]。《光:科学与应用(英文版)》(Light:Scienceamp;Applications)通过组织交叉学科前沿热点专题,期刊影响因子和国际地位稳步提升[8]。《材料科学技术(英文版)》(JournalofMaterialsScienceamp;Technology)将组织优秀稿源和热点专刊作为重点工作,提“质\"增“量\"协同发力提升期刊影响力[9]。……
