腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎比较
2019-08-19王义涛
王义涛


[摘要] 目的 對比开腹阑尾切除术、腹腔镜阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎中的应用价值,探讨急性阑尾炎的最佳手术方案。 方法 用“单双号随机分组法”将方便选取2016年3月—2018年5月在该院接受治疗的20例急性阑尾炎患者分为10例/组。分别是对照组(开腹阑尾切除术)、观察组(腹腔镜阑尾切除术)。比较术中、术后指标及手术并发症、血液指标检测结果。 结果 观察组患者术中失血量(10.58±4.48)mL少于对照组,手术用时(44.58±21.16)min、术后抗生素使用时间(2.25±1.05)d、术后胃肠功能恢复时间(15.58±7.31)h、术后下床活动时间(10.52±2.25)h以及住院天数(2.26±1.15)d均比对照组短(t=4.050 5、1.147 4、3.957 2、9.637 6、6.260 8、4.097 5,P<0.05);两组对比术后并发症总发生率,观察组vs对照组=10.00% vs 40.00%,得出(χ2=2.400 0,P=0.121 3);检测血液指标发现,术后第1天对照组淋巴细胞水平低于观察组(t=2.126 5,P=0.047 6),术后第1天、第3天对照组中性粒细胞和白细胞水平都比观察组高(t=4.431 3、4.591 1、4.585 0、2.591 1,P=0.000 3、0.021 2、0.000 2、0.018 4)。 结论 急性阑尾炎采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术的整体效果要明显好于传统开腹手术。
[关键词] 急性阑尾炎;阑尾切除术;开腹;腹腔镜
[中图分类号] R656.8 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2019)05(b)-0032-03
[Abstract] Objective To compare the value of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy in acute appendicitis, and to explore the best surgical plan for acute appendicitis. Methods 20 patients with acute appendicitis who were treated in our hospital from March 2016 to May 2018 were convenient selected and divided into 10 cases/group by “single and double random grouping method”. They were the control group (open appendectomy) and the observation group (laparoscopic appendectomy). Compare intraoperative and postoperative indexes with surgical complications and blood test results. Results The blood loss (10.58±4.48)mL in the observation group was less than that in the control group, the time of surgery (44.58±21.16)minutes, the time of antibiotic use (2.25±1.05)days, and the recovery time of postoperative gastrointestinal function (15.58± 7.31)hours, postoperative outpatient activity time (10.52±2.25)hours and hospitalization days (2.26±1.15)days were shorter than the control group (t=4.050 5, 1.147 4, 3.957 2, 9.637 6, 6.260 8, 4.097 5,P<0.05); the total incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups, the observation group vs control group = 10.00% vs 40.00%,(χ2=2.400 0, P=0.121 3); blood test indicators found, postoperative lymphocyte level of the control group was lower than that of the observation group on the first day (t=2.126 5, P=0.047 6). The neutrophil and leukocyte levels in the control group were higher than those in the observation group on the first and third day after surgery (t=4.431 3, 4.524 9, 4.585 0, 4.591 1, P=0.000 3, 0.021 2, 0.000 2, 0.018 4). Conclusion The overall effect of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is significantly better than that of traditional open surgery.
[Key words] Acute appendicitis; Appendectomy; Open surgery; Laparoscopy
阑尾炎是非常常见的一种疾病,大多急性发病,在所有急腹症中,发病率较高,作为一种急性炎症,以腹痛、腹泻、恶心呕吐为主要症状[1],多以手术治疗[2]。医疗技术的发展推进了微创手术进程,腹腔镜手术是非常典型的一种微创技术,具有创伤小、恢复快等多种优势[3]。该文旨在对比开腹手术、腹腔镜手术在急性阑尾炎中的应用效果,方便选择患者共计20例(2016年3月—2018年5月),具体内容见正文部分,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
从该院收治的急性阑尾炎患者当中方便选出20例。
该次研究所选病例已通过伦理委员会批准,所有患者或家属知情同意该次研究内容和目的,采用“单双号随机分组法”将上述20例患者分为10例/组。
观察组(男:女=6:4),年龄:28~52岁,均(34.26±4.16)周岁;5例单纯性阑尾炎,5例化脓性阑尾炎。
对照组(男:女=5:5),年龄:27~54岁,均(34.15±4.28)周岁;6例单纯性阑尾炎,4例化脓性阑尾炎。……
