ZhaoDi

【Abstract】To some extent， subject of educational policy value choice deviate society expect problems， mainly in the main body of educational policy “fair in light of value choice and social equity in education requirements have increased the gap.” As an applied science， social policy research on social welfare contains strong value.

【Key words】Higher Education； Fairness； Social Policy

Since the new period， especially the ten years at the end of the last century， Chinese higher education has made the development achievement which attracts the peoples attention. And there are three aspects of the development momentum that most people commend. The first is accelerating the popularization of higher education.

Since 1999， the higher education of our country has entered a period of rapid development. In 2002， higher education gross enrollment rate in our country was 15070， indicating our country is to realize the popularization of higher education. In 2010 the higher education gross enrollment rate was 26.5070， indicating the popularization of higher education achieve further deep degree. The second is continuously improvement of the quality of higher education. Since the 90s of last century， higher education management department is mainly taking two measures to strengthen the quality control of higher education. One is the implementation of key development strategy， focused on building a high level university；under its impetus to our higher education level rapidly overtake century level. Two is to implement “five years turn” of higher education quality evaluation system of higher education quafity， and the implementation of the standardization of control. Three is deepening the reform of higher education system. On one hand， the government gradually change function， advance government school separately and continues to implement and expand the school running autonomy of higher schools. On the other hand， accelerate the improvement of Chinese characteristics of modern university system construction and perfect the corporate governance structure of higher schools. In order to ensure the sustained， healthy development of higher education， our government attaches great importance to the construction of long-term policy of higher education. So far， we have formed a relatively complete system of policy of higher education. Chinas higher education policy system mainly includes：“general policy” and “guiding specific areas of policy” in two aspects. In July 2002， the state promulgated the “national medium and long-term educational reform and development program” （2010-2020 years）， hereinafter referred to as “educational program”， in order to further deepen the reform of higher education system and perfect the higher education policies system laid the foundation for development policy， target， and task and working key. In June 2012， the national Ministry of Education issued “the national education development in Twelfth Five Year Plan”， to determine the”12th Five-Year Plan”， the education development guiding ideology， main goal and basic train of thought. Put forward to move or retreat to implement the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and strategy of talent powerful nation， promote the priority of education development， scientific development， make education more in line with the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics on the need of talent training， more in line with the broad masses of the people on the educational expectations， more in line with the trend of the times. More than two programmatic documents for the future development of education in China pointed out the development. However， while the rapid development of Chinas higher education development process， there are still some aspects that are not just as one wishes. From the perspective of social policy research， there have four aspects：one is more prominent with the “college entrance examination” related higher education fair starting point problem. The second is the difficult problem of employment of College students. The third is the financial difficulties students higher education rights. The fourth is the private higher education and higher education of social organization development slow problem. The development of higher education in China is the short board at the higher education policy， the imbalance between equity and efficiency problem. Others have pointed out that：“the masses of our people to education equity and efficiency conditions of satisfaction are not high. One of the reasons lies in the education policy did not handle the relationship with good equity and efficiency. After more than half a century of development， policy studies has become the subject of social guiding principle is relatively narrow and “education plan” period （2010-2020 years） for the strategic goal more broadly， between the two logical confusion.

References：

[1][US]F.J.Goodnow.Politics and Administration[US].Beijing：Huaxia Publishing House，1987 edition.

[2]Sun Guohua.Jurisprudence Course[M].Beijing：Renmin University of China Press，1994 edition.

[3]Zhang Weiping.Balance and constraints of the 20th century education law[M].Jinan：Shandong Education Press，1995 edition.endprint