梁华云?马丽环

【摘要】 目的 探讨双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合四磨汤对儿童厌食症的治疗效果。方法 选取96例厌食症患儿按随机数字表法分成观察组和对照组， 各48例。对照组采用四磨汤进行治疗， 观察组在对照组的基础上给予双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊。对比两组的治疗效果及治疗前、后腹部皮下脂肪厚度。结果 观察组治疗的总有效率明显较对照组高， 差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组治疗前皮下脂肪厚度差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；观察组治疗后皮下脂肪厚度明显高于对照组， 差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合四磨汤可有效的提高对儿童厌食症的治疗效果。

【关键词】 双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊；四磨汤；儿童厌食症

DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.08.010

Analysis of treatment for infantile anorexia by bifidobacterium triple viable capsule combined with Simo decoction LIANG Hua-yun， MA Li-huan. Guangzhou City Luogang District Jiulong Town Central Hospital， Guangzhou 510555， China

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate curative effect by bifidobacterium triple viable capsule combined with Simo decoction in the treatment of infantile anorexia. Methods A total of 96 children with anorexia were divided by random number table into observation group and control group， with 48 cases in each group. The control group received Simo decoction for treatment， and the observation group received additional bifidobacterium triple viable capsule. Comparisons were made on curative effects and abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness before and after treatment between the two groups. Results The observation group had much higher total effective rate than the control group， and the difference had statistical significance （P<0.05）. There was no statistically significant difference of subcutaneous fat thickness between the two groups before treatment （P>0.05）. While the observation group had much higher subcutaneous fat thickness than the control group after treatment， and the difference had statistical significance （P<0.05）. Conclusion Combination of bifidobacterium triple viable capsule and Simo decoction can effectively improve curative effect in treating infantile anorexia.

【Key words】 Bifidobacterium triple viable capsule； Simo decoction； Infantile anorexia

厌食症是指较长时间出现食欲减退、消失或食量减少的一种疾病， 为消化功能紊乱的一种， 给儿童生长发育形成严重的影响[1]。本研究采用双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊联合四磨汤对厌食症患儿进行治疗， 获得了满意的临床疗效， 现报告如下。

1 资料与方法

1. 1 一般资料 选取2013年8月～2015年7月收治的96例厌食症患儿按随机数字表法分成观察组和对照组， 各48例。观察组中男26例， 女22例；年龄2～8岁， 平均年龄（4.87±1.89）岁；病程5～10个月， 平均病程（6.18±1.83）个月。对照组中男27例， 女21例；年龄2～9岁， 平均年龄（4.93±1.92）岁；病程5～11个月， 平均病程（6.21±1.96）个月。所有患儿均依据《实用儿科学》[2]中的诊断标准而纳入本次分析， 排除胃肠道器质性病变、微量元素缺乏及药物所致的厌食患儿， 距离本次治疗1周内均未使用抗生素、微生态制剂。两组患儿年龄、性别等一般资料比较， 差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）， 具有可比性。

1. 2 方法 患儿入院后均行补锌、健脾及纠正不良饮食习惯等常规治疗措施。……