APP下载

电话随访对冠心病患者住院频率的影响

2014-10-21杨祝玲

中国保健营养·中旬刊 2014年6期

杨祝玲

【摘 要】目的:探讨电话随访对冠心病患者住院频率的影响,揭示电话随访对冠心病患者的重要性。方法:选取冠心病患者80人,其中38人未进行电话随访为对照组,42人经过电话回访为随访组。统计一年内每位患者的住院次数及每组患者的住院总次数,再计算出一年内每组患者的人均住院次数,即住院频率,然后比较两组患者住院频率的高低。结果:两组患者住院频率比较,随访组的住院频率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:电话随访可明显降低冠心病患者的住院频率。

【关键词】住院频率;电话随访;冠心病患者

【中图分类号】R541.4 【文章编号】1004-7484(2014)06-3429-02

Influence of Phone Call Following-up on Frequency of Hospitalization of

Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

YANG Zhuling

(Department of Medicine, the Second People's Hospital Haihua General Hospital, Hunan Province, Haihua 418000, China)

【Abstract】Objective:To explore influence of phone call following-up on frequency of hospitalization of patients with coronary heart disease(CHD), so as to reveal the importance of following-up by telephone to CHD patients. Methods:80 CHD patients were selected. And they were divided into control group including 38 cases without following-up and following-up group including 42 ones. Then added up respectively each patients times of hospitalization and each groups total hospitalization times in one year. Afterwards, per capita times in hospital of each group in the year, namely frequency of hospitalization, was worked out. Then the hospitalization frequency was compared between the two groups. Results:Between the two groups, hospitalization frequency of following-up group was lower than that one of control group, and there was a statistical differences(P<0.05). Conclusion:Phone call following-up can reduce the hospitalization frequency of patients with CHD.

【key words】Frequency of hospitalization; Phone call following-up; Patients with CHD

冠心病是一种终身性疾病,往往因病情反复加重而频繁住院治疗,这既增加了患者的痛苦,也增加了医疗费用。住院频率的高低是评价患者治疗效果好坏的一项重要参考指标,如何减少患者的住院频率、提高生活质量是广大医务人员、患者及其家属共同关心的问题。本研究探讨电话随访对冠心病患者住院频率的影响。

1 资料与方法

1.1 一般资料

选取自2012年3月至2013年3月冠心病患者80人( 均符合冠心病的诊断标准[1],合并其他严重疾病者均排除在外,如合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病、原发性或继发性高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾功能衰竭、严重贫血、恶性肿瘤等),其中38人未进行电话随访为对照组(患者不愿意接受电话随访),42人经过电话随访为随访组。对照组及随访组中男性分别为23人和24人,女性分别为15人和18人;对照组年龄为43~82岁,平均(59.57±20.36)岁,随访组年龄为39~85岁,平均(57.36±19.58)岁;随访开始时对照组及随访组中心功能I级[2]者分别为28人和34人,心功能II级[2]者分别为10人和8人,两组均无心功能III级[2]及IV级[2]患者。……

登录APP查看全文