康复护理在小儿重症病毒性脑炎护理中的效果观察及临床价值
2021-09-10王静
王静



[关键词] 康复护理;小儿重症病毒性脑炎;症状/体征消退时间;生存状态
[中图分类号] R473.5 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2021)21-0170-03
Effect observation and clinical value of rehabilitation nursing in the nursing of children with severe viral encephalitis
WANG Jing
Endoscope Room,Taian Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Tai′an 271000,China
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical value of rehabilitation nursing in children with severe viral encephalitis (SVE). Methods Fifty-eight children with SVE in the hospital from May 2018 to May 2019 were selected as the study subjects.Based on the lottery method,30 cases were included in group A and given rehabilitation care;28 cases were included in group B and received routine care.The time required for recovery of the symptoms/signs,and the survival status after one year of follow-up were compared. Results The recovery time of symptoms/signs in group A was shorter than that in group B,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).After one year of follow-up,the survival status scores of group A were higher than those of group B.The total effective rate was 93.33% in group A and 64.29% in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Rehabilitation nursing for children with SVE can promote the recovery of symptoms/signs and improve the long-term survival status.
[Key words] Rehabilitation nursing;Severe viral encephalitis in children;Symptoms/signs subsiding time;Survival status
病毒性腦炎(Viral encephalitis,VE)是频发性中枢神经系统病症,其感染风险较高,且多发于小儿群体[1]。致病菌为病毒,病理表现为颅内突发性炎症,症状以意识模糊和高热为主。SVE的病情危重,可能导致患儿死亡。临床多通过降温和降颅内压等形式控制病情,目的是控制惊厥,恢复患儿的呼吸与神经功能。其治疗原则是早期干预、足量给药和短时间治疗[2-3]。但在治疗期间可能因护理不当导致远期伤残情况,影响患儿的生存状态。基于此,临床积极采取护理服务,目的是确保治疗整体化疗效,改善患儿预后。但常规化护理的针对性欠佳,且护理措施欠全面,未关注对患儿实行康复相关性护理[4]。因此,本研究选取2018年5月至2019年5月间来院治疗的58例SVE患儿,用于分析康复护理用于该病患儿的临床效用,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
患儿诊治时间介于2018年5月至2019年5月,共计SVE患儿58例。经实验室指标等确诊为SVE;临床资料相对完整;家属对研究知情而且完全同意;研究经伦理委员会审核以后准许开展。排除合并免疫与精神系统疾病;伴心肝肾病症;伴其他脑病和中途退出患儿。根据抽签法分组后,A组记录30例,男患儿比女患儿的数值等于14:16;年龄4~11岁,平均(6.85±0.71)岁;病程1~5 d,平均(2.65±0.42) d。B组记录28例,男患儿比女患儿的数值等于17:11;年龄3~12岁,平均(6.98±0.80)岁;病程2~5 d,平均(2.99±0.35)d。两组临床资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
1.2方法……p>
