泛基因型直接抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本-效用分析
2021-06-15魏霞杨莉
魏霞 杨莉



中圖分类号 R956 文献标志码 A 文章编号 1001-0408(2021)08-0979-07
DOI 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2021.08.14
摘 要 目的:评价泛基因型直接抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本-效用,为相关医疗卫生决策提供药物经济学证据。方法:从全社会角度出发,以中国初治慢性丙型肝炎患者为目标人群,参考文献资料建立Markov模型,以索磷布韦维帕他韦为对照,分析格卡瑞韦派伦他韦、索磷布韦+可洛派韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效用比(ICERs);采用敏感性分析验证结果的稳健性。结果:与索磷布韦维帕他韦相比,格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦增加了0.002 1 QALYs,成本增加25 021元,ICERs为12 129 031元/QALY(意愿支付阈值为70 892元/QALY),不具有成本-效用;当其单价下降至1 679元时(降价64.65%)将具有成本-效用。索磷布韦+可洛派韦增加了0.002 0 QALYs,成本减少515元,是成本节约的绝对优势方案。敏感性分析显示,持续病毒学应答率和药品价格对结果的影响最大,索磷布韦+可洛派韦具有成本-效用的概率高于格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦。结论:格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦需大幅降低价格,才可达到更好的可负担性;索磷布韦+可洛派韦具有良好的经济性。
关键词 慢性丙型肝炎;直接抗病毒药物;成本-效用分析;Markov模型;泛基因型
Cost-utility Analysis of the Pan-genotypic Direct-acting Antivirals in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection
WEI Xia,YANG Li(School of Public Health, Peking University/Health Policy and Technology Assessment Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China)
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-utility of the pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, and to provide pharmacoeconomic evidence for relevant health care decisions. METHODS: A Markov model was established from a societal perspective with newly diagnosed chronic hepatitis C patients in China as the target population, and analyzed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICERs) of patients with chronic hepatitis C with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, sofosbuvir+coblopasvir. Sensitivity analysis was used to verity the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir increased QALYs by 0.002 1 and costs by 25 021 RMB, compared to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir; its ICERs was 12 129 031 yuan/QALY (willingness to pay threshold was 70 892 yuan/QALY), which had no cost-utility; glecaprevir/pibrentasvir need to cut down the price by 64.65% to have cost-utility. Sofosbuvir+coblopasvir increased QALYs by 0.002 0 and saved costs by 515 yuan, so it was the optimal regimen which was cost-saving. Sensitivity analysis showed that SVR rates and drug prices were the most influential factors. The probability of having cost-utility for sofosbuvir+coblopasvir was higher than glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. CONCLUSIONS: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir need to reduce the price to achieve better affordability. Sofosbuvir+coblopasvir shows economical advantage.
KEYWORDS Chronic hepatitis C virus infection; Direct-acting antivirals; Cost-utility analysis; Markov model; Pan-genotypic
丙型肝炎是由丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染引起的传染性肝病。HCV是多变异病毒,主要包括7种基因型,我国丙型肝炎患者常见的HCV基因型从多到少依次为1b型(56.8%)、2型(24.1%)、3型(9.1%)及6型(6.3%),少见4型和5型的相关报道[1]。HCV慢性感染可导致肝脏慢性炎症坏死和纤维化,并可发展为肝硬化甚至肝癌,对患者的健康和生命危害极大,已成为严重的社会和公共卫生问题[1]。……
