APP下载

不同的保头手术在酒精性股骨头坏死早期治疗中应用比较分析

2020-10-21刘雨亮何玉芹

健康必读(上旬刊) 2020年6期

刘雨亮 何玉芹

【摘  要】目的:观察酒精性股骨头坏死早期治疗工作现状,行不同的保头手术治疗,分析两种方式的临床应用效果。方法:借助统计软件将2018年1月-2019年1月期间在本院接受治疗的40例酒精性股骨头坏死患者分为两组,对照组接受髓芯减压置入陶瓷棒治疗,研究组接受髓芯减压置入陶瓷棒联合PRP(富血小板血浆)治疗,两组患者对比手术治疗前后VAS评分、Harris评分。结果:两组患者手术前VAS评分差异对比不明显(P>0.05),研究组患者手术后VAS评分低于对照组 (P<0.05);研究组患者手术后Harris总评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:酒精性股骨头坏死早期治疗中应用髓芯减压置入陶瓷棒联合PRP治疗,可有效缓解其术后疼痛,改善髋关节功能,该模式在临床上具有较高应用价值。

【关键词】酒精性;股骨头坏死;早期治疗;不同;保头手术;VAS;Harris

【中图分类号】R687      【文献标识码】A      【文章编号】1672-3783(2020)06-0052-01

[Abstract] objective: to observe the status of early treatment of alcohol-induced femur head necrosis, and to analyze the clinical effect of the two methods. Methods: with the aid of statistical software will be in January 2018 - January 2019 treated in our hospital during the period of 40 patients with alcoholic avascular necrosis were divided into two groups, control group treated with marrow core decompression in ceramic rod, the team accept pulp core decompression in ceramic rod joint PRP (platelet rich plasma treatment, compared two groups of patients before and after surgical treatment VAS score, Harris score. Results: there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups before surgery (P >0.05), and VAS score in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The total Harris score of patients in the study group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: the application of core decompression and ceramic rod combined with PRP in the early treatment of alcohol-induced femoral head necrosis can effectively relieve the postoperative pain and improve the function of hip joint.

[Key words] alcohol; Necrosis of femoral head; Early treatment; Different; Head protection operation; VAS. Harris

酒精性股骨頭坏死在骨科临床上属于常见且高发的一种骨科疾病,主要原因是因为患者饮酒过量等因素所占。关于该疾病机制的研究研究截止到目前尚无统一定论[1]。此次研究为有减轻患者术后疼痛,改善其髋关节功能,对收治的部分患者行髓芯减压置入陶瓷棒联合PRP,研究如下。

1资料与方法

1.1一般资料

40例酒精性股骨头坏死患者借助统计软件分为对照与研究两组,每组患者各20例。纳入标准:确诊为酒精性股骨头坏死,了解研究内容自愿加入。排除标准:心肝肾等器官严重性功能异常、精神疾病,智力异常,无正常交流能力等。

对照组男女比例12∶8,年龄均值(43.11±1.39)岁,研究组男女比例13∶7,年龄均值(43.60±1.40)岁。患者资料差异不明显(P>0.05),院伦理委员会已批准。

1.2方法

1.2.1对照组行髓芯减压置入陶瓷棒治疗。患者接受营养联合麻醉,选择仰卧体位,……

登录APP查看全文