Patrick K. Malonza, David M. Mulwa, Joash O. Nyamache, Georgina Jones

1 Section of Herpe tology, Nationa l Museums of Kenya, Nairobi 40658-00100, Kenya

2 Base Titanium Ltd, Ukunda 1214-80400, Kenya

3 Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nairobi 40658-00100, Kenya

INTRODUCTION

Biogeography is the study of the geographic distribution of organism s, and includes historical, ecological, and conservation biogeography. Historical biogeography addresses the causes of the past distribution of species, whereas ecological biogeography studies the factors (mainly biotic and abiotic) that define the current spatial distribution of species (Monge-Nájera,2008). Conservation biogeography is the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses, especially on species distribution to problem s concerning biodiversity conservation (Whittaker et al., 2005).1

Global biodiversity hot spots are areas that support high species richness and endemism, and face considerable threats relative to the remaining area (Mittermeier et al., 2005; Myers et al., 2000, 2003). Currently, there are 35 global biodiversity hots pots, with two represented in Kenya (Sloan et al., 2014).One is the Eastern Afromontane hotspot represented by the Taita Hills plus mountain and highland areas in central (Mt.Kenya, Aberdare Range, and Nyambene Hills) and western(Kakamega Forest, Nandi Forests, Cherangani Hills, and Mau Hills) Kenya. The other is the coastal forests of eastern Africa represented by the coastal forests of Kenya, with the two most well-known being the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest and Shimba Hills.

Historically, the Shimba Hills have been categorized as a coastal forest (Burgess & Muir, 1994; Howell, 1993) and are one of the richest herpetological areas in Kenya. Other rich herpetofaunal areas include the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest (Chira,1993; Drewes, 1992); Kakamega Forest (Wagner et al., 2008;Lötters et al., 2007;; Wagner & Böhme, 2007; Schick et al.,2005), and Taita Hills (Malonza & Veith, 2012; Malonza et al.,2010; Burgess et al., 2007; Malonza, 2008; Newmark, 2002;Lovett, 1990).

The Shimba Hills ecosystem has diverse habitat types that include forests, woodlands, grasslands, bushlands, and wetlands (rivers, swam ps, and dam s). This habitat diversity relates to the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis, which suggests that structurally com plex habitats provide more niches and diverse ways of exploiting environmental resources and hence increase species diversity (Tews et al.,2004). In the Shimba Hills ecosystem, some of the key amphibian and reptile habitat areas are manmade dam s such as Mukurumudzi. In addition to the gazetted forest reserves are the sacred Mijikenda community Kaya forests, which vary from small to large and are key sites that act as refuges for unique and rare biodiversity within community land (Githitho, 2003). The flagship herpetofaunal species for the Shimba Hills ecosystem are the endem ic Shimba Hills reed frogHyperolius rubrovermiculatusSchiøtz, 1975, andAfrixalus sylvaticus(Schiøtz, 1974), which are listed as Endangered (EN) in the IUCN Red List.

Past herpetological museum collections in the Shimba Hills have given an indication that this area m ight be a unique site,recording species both endem ic to low land coastal forests as well as the Eastern Arc Mountain forests. No past biodiversity work has assessed the exact biogeographical assignment of the Shimba Hills because it has been assumed to be a typical coastal forest. Recently, however, Bwong et al. (2014)exam ined some of the area’s amphibians and hinted that the Shimba Hills National Reserve m ight be at a biogeographical crossroads.

Therefore, the aim of this paper was to assess the am phibian and reptile fauna of the Shimba Hills ecosystem, with a focus on their zoogeographical affinities. Herpetofauna are good zoogeographical indicators due to their low dispersal abilities com pared with higher vertebrates like birds and mammals (Bell& Donnelly, 2006; Pineda & Halffter, 2004). We used herpetofauna to test the hypothesis that the Shimba Hills ecosystem is a coastal forest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

The Shimba Hills ecosystem occurs along the south coast of Kenya in Kwale County (Figure 1). The ecosystem is diverse and dotted with important biodiversity sites ranging from forests,bushlands, and grasslands to wetlands, and all at varying levels of habitat disturbance. These sites occur from sea level up to about 430 m in hills w ithin the Shimba Hills National Reserve.The Shimba Hills ecosystem includes protected areas such as the Shimba Hills National Reserve, Buda Forest, Gongoni Forest, Mwaluganje Community Wildlife Conservancy, Kaya forests, community lands, and private dams such as Mukurumudzi.

Herpeto faunal sam p ling

Field sam pling was conducted in different sites covering varying seasons from July 2012 to June 2017. Each sampling visit was done for two weeks covering different sites. The periods and frequencies of sam p ling visits are provided below:

1. July/August 2012 (dry season) Mukurumudzi River Dam site (Miembeni, Nguluku, and Maumba);

2. November/December 2012 (wet season) Mukurumudzi River Dam site (Miembeni, Nguluku, and Maumba);

3. April/May 2013 (dry/wet season) Mukurumudzi River Dam site (Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, and dam-site);

4. June 2013 (wet season) Mukurumudzi Dam (Miem beni,Nguluku, Maumba, and dam-site), Mtawa stream, and Gongoni Forest pond;

5. September 2013 (dry season) Mukurumudzi Dam(Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, and dam-site);

6. November/December 2013 (wet season) Mukurumudzi Dam (Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu), Gongoni Forest, and Gongoni Forest pond;

7. March/April 2014 (wet season) Mukurum udzi Dam(Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu), Gongoni Forest, and Gongoni Forest pond;

8. June/July 2014 (wet season) Mukurumudzi Dam(Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

9. September 2014 (dry season) Mukurumudzi Dam(Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

10. November/December 2014 (wet season) Mukurumudzi Dam (Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

11. March/April 2015 (dry season) Mukurumudzi Dam(Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

12. May 2015 (wet season) Shimba Hills National Reserve(Longo Forest, Makadara Forest, Mwele Forest, Kaya Kwale Forest, Shimba Lodge wetland, Mwadabara bushland, Mwadabara wetland, Kivumoni Gate wetland,and Sheldrick Falls wetland), Gongoni Forest, Gongoni pond, Buda Forest, Mwabanda community land wetland,and Mukurumudzi Dam (Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba,dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

13. August/September 2015 (wet season) Shimba Hills National Reserve (Longo Forest, Makadara Forest,Shimba Lodge wetland, and Mwadabara wetland),Gongoni Forest, Gongoni pond, Buda Forest, and Mukurumudzi Dam (Miembeni, Nguluku, Maum ba, damsite, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

Figure 1 Map o f Kw ale show ing the Shim ba Hills National Reserve, Buda, Gongoni and other p rotected forest reserves (Draw n by Edw in N. Gichohi)

14. November 2015 (wet season) Shimba Hills National Reserve (Longo Forest, Makadara Forest, Kaya Kwale Forest, and Shimba Lodge wetland), Gongoni Forest,Gongoni pond, Buda Forest, and Mukurumudzi Dam(Miembeni, Nguluku, Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu);

15. March 2016 (dry season) Shimba Hills National Reserve(Longo Forest, Makadara Forest, and Shimba Lodge wetland), Gongoni Forest, Buda Forest, Mukurumudzi Dam (Miembeni, Maumba, Nguluku, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu), Kaya forests (Kinondo,Ukunda, Tiwi, Muhaka, Waa, Sega, Lunguma, Chonyi,and Gandini);

16. May/June 2016 (wet season) Shimba Hills National Reserve (Longo Forest, Makadara Forest, Shimba Lodge wetland, and Mwadabara wetland), Gongoni Forest, Gongoni pond, Buda Forest, Mukurumudzi Dam(Miembeni, Maumba, dam-site, tailings storage facility-Vumbu), and Kaya forests (Kinondo, Muhaka, and Gandini);

18. June 2017 (wet season) Mukurumudzi Dam (Miembeni,Maumba, dam-site, and tailings storage facility-Vumbu),Shimba Hills National Reserve (Longo Forest, Makadara Forest, Mwele Forest, Shimba Lodge wetland,Mwadabara wetland, and Mwele Forest stream),Gongoni Forest, Gongoni pond, and Kaya forests(Kinondo and Muhaka).

Two standard methods (timed-species count and pitfall trapping) were used during field sampling.

(i) Time-lim ited searching (TLS): This is a form of timedspecies counting. Here, sam p ling was conducted for a lim ited time period of two hours during the day and one hour at night w ithin a given selected habitat w ithout setting boundaries using three observers. The procedure is similar to the time constrained search-and-seize method described previously(Heyer et al., 1994; Karns, 1986). It involves quietly and slow ly walking and recording all individual reptiles and am phibians found in different m icro-habitats such as on the ground, in debris, under decomposing logs, on trees, shrubs, grass, reeds,and sedges, for one-person hour. It also involves digging in suitable m icro-habitats in search of burrowing species such as skinks, caecilians, frogs, and snakes. For reptiles, this was done mostly in the morning session when they are most active,and can be observed basking, resting, or foraging. Night searches for am phibians involved visiting various selected wetlands (river beds/edges, ponds, pools, and marshlands) for one hour from 19:00hrs. In wetlands at night we used both visual and acoustic techniques to record frog species.

(ii) Pitfall traps associated with drift fence: An X-shaped drift fence with pitfall traps, consisting of 5-m long segments, was used in this study (Malonza et al., 2011). This is a modification of the single array design used by Corn (1994). A drift fence (30 cm high) was stapled vertically onto wooden stakes or pegs.The pitfall traps consisted of 10-L plastic buckets flush to the ground, with every trap array having five buckets in total. The traps were normally opened and checked for five nights and were mostly used for detection of small, primarily nocturnal,craw ling herpetofauna not easily detected through other methods. This method was only used in four sites within Mukurumudzi Dam.

(iii) Opportunistic encounters: This qualitative method involved recording all species found or encountered opportunistically for every site outside of the ordinary sam p ling period of the two standard methods mentioned above. Data from other surveys outside the systematic surveys were also included.

Shim ba Hills National Reserve

The Shimba Hills National Reserve is the main protected area in this ecosystem and is com prised of different habitat types,including forests, grasslands, woodlands, bushlands, and wetlands (rivers and swamps). It is managed by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) in collaboration with the Kenya Forest Service (KFS). The following sites were sampled during this study: Makadara Forest (S04°14.253′; E039°23.742′; 426 ma.s.l.); Longo-Mwagandi Forest (S04°14.264′; E039°25.566′;398 m); Mwele Forest (S04°17.198′; E039°21.766′; 334 m);Kaya Kwale Forest (S04°10.888′, E039°26.737′; 417 m); Mwele stream spring (S04°16.323′, E039°22.214′; 329 m); Shimba Hills Lodge wetlands (S04°11.559′; E039°25.555′; 290 m);Mwandabara 1 water pump station roadside wetlands(S04°10.854′; E039°25.158′; 159 m); and Sheldrick Falls(S04°17.098′; E039°25.849′; 146 m).

Fo rest reserves

The forest reserves are managed by the Kenya Forest Service(KFS), formerly the Forest Department (FD), which allows local communities to harvest sustainably some forest products, such as dead fuelwood. The following sites were sampled during this study: Gongoni Forest (S04°24.176′, E039°27.604′; 42 m);Gongoni Forest pond (S04°25.778′, E039°27.755′; 24 m); and Buda Forest (S04°25.734′, E039°24.292′; 100 m).

加快推进全市基础行业和优势行业的转型升级和提质增效。发挥百色铝产业优势，合理开发利用铝土矿资源，着力构建铝产业链和配套产业链。加快淘汰冶炼行业落后产能、改造提升技术装备水平；整合全市矿产资源，发展铝铜深加工行业。全面提升铝加工行业的整体竞争力，加快发展高性能、绿色环保的精细化工产品和高端化工新材料产品。加强与贵州、云南区域间的电力合作，实现优势互补，降低工业用电成本。提升改造传统建材行业，突破发展新兴建材行业。

Kaya fo rests

Kayas are sacred sites that owe their continued protection to the long-standing and environmentally friendly Mijikenda community traditions, taboos, beliefs, and cultures. The Mijikenda (nine sub-tribes) includes Giriama, Chonyi, Rabai,Ribe, Kauma, Kambe, and Jibana of Kilifi County along the north coast of Mombasa plus Digo and Duruma of Kwale County along the south coast. These traditions regulate access and conduct within these forests, threatening dire punishment from the spirit world for those who flout the rules (Githitho,2003). The Kayas occur on hill tops, ridges, valleys, or along coastal beach fronts. Because of their cultural values to the community, most Kayas are protected as monuments under the National Museum s and Heritage Act, 2006, and placed under the management of the National Museums of Kenya (NMK). In addition, some are protected as forest reserves and managed by the KFS, but all are managed by the local community Kaya elders in collaboration with either the NMK or KFS. In addition,several Kayas, namely Kaya Giriama (Fungo), Rabai Kayas(Mudzimuvya, Bomu, and Fimboni), Kaya Kambe, Kaya Jibana,Kaya Ribe, Kaya Kauma (all in Kilifi), and Duruma Kayas(Gandini and Mts wakara) in Kwale were listed as World Heritage sites by United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organizatio (UNESCO) in 2008. This was based on their roles as living legacies of the local people’s history, culture,and religion. Currently, however, many Kayas are now highly degraded because the youthful generations disregard these traditions. The following are the Kwale Kaya forests sampled in this study (only during the day): Kaya Kinondo (S04°23.588′;E039°32.810′; 8 m); Kaya Ukunda (S04°18.783′; E039°34.047′;26 m); Kaya Tiwi (S04°15.280′; E039°35.824′; 20 m); Kaya Muhaka (S04°19.941′; E039°31.054′; 50 m); Kaya Waa(S04°12.131′; E039°36.827′; 25 m); Kaya Sega (S04°033.254′;E039°04.745′; 74 m); Kaya Lunguma (S04°07.570′;E039°31.198′; 132 m); Kaya Chonyi (S04°03.962′; E039°31.777′; 52 m); and Kaya Gandini (S04°02.163′; E039°30.426′;153 m).

Mukurumudzi Dam

The Mukurumudzi Dam area was initially a human settlement along the Mukurumudzi River just below Shimba Hills town. The residents were resettled to pave way for mineral sands mining and subsequent habitat restoration by Base Titanium Limited.Construction of the dam earth embankment started in 2011,with the dam undergoing initial filling in May 2013. Pre-dam herpetological monitoring in four sites started in July 2012 and continued with post-dam monitoring from June 2013 to June 2017. After the dam was filled, the monitoring sites were divided into upstream and downstream sites. The sites selected were those with substantial remnant indigenous forest patches,assumed to act as species refuges for the once expansive coastal forests. In addition, due to their location at the edge of the dam, all sites have wetlands for night frog sampling. The major aim was to determine the impacts of the dam on reptile and amphibian composition over time. The following areas were sam p led in this study: Upstream sites: Miembeni (S04°22.512′,E039°25.529′; 56 m); Maumba (S04°23.520′, E039°25.774′; 82 m);and Nguluku (S04°23.967′, E039°25.360′; 87 m); Downstream sites: dam-site (S04°24.444′, E039°26.021′; 37m); and tailings storage facility-Vumbu (S04°23.846′, E039°27.057′; 43 m).

Community sites sampled:The Mwabanda wetland, which is a wetland within a rice field stream valley (S04°26.499′,E039°26.399′; 32 m), and Mtawa stream (S04°21.217′,E039°28.125; 74 m) were sampled in this study.

Species data

Data on species presence were acquired from literature and past and recent fieldwork, as well as early specimen collections housed at the Herpetology Section of the NMK since 1960s.

Collected representative voucher specimens were euthanized in a humane manner according to standard protocols. Amphibian specimens were euthanized with MS222 solution and reptiles with pentobarbital solution and then preserved in 10% formalin and stored in 70% ethanol solution.Selected tissue sam ples were taken and stored in absolute ethanol for later molecular analysis. Color photographs of selected species and their habitats were taken. A 12 Channel Garm in®receiver was used to collect GPS data. The collected voucher materials were deposited at the NMK in Nairobi.

RESULTS

Species richness

Based on recent field collections, records, and past museum specimens, a total of 89 reptile (47 snakes, 39 lizards, 1 terrapin, 1 tortoise, and 1 crocodile) and 38 amphibian species(36 frogs and 2 caecilians) occur in the Shimba Hills ecosystem. In comparison with other her pet of aunal-rich areas in Kenya, the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest has a total of 80 reptile(46 snakes, 31 lizards, 1 terrapin, and 2 tortoises) and 30 amphibian species (all frogs), the Kakamega Forest has 61 reptile (38 snakes, 21 lizards, 1 terrapin, 1 tortoise) and 24 amphibian species (all frogs), and the Taita Hills have 65 reptile(34 snakes, 28 lizards, 1 terrapin, and 2 tortoises) and 26 am phibian species (24 frogs and 2 caecilians) (Supp lementary Table 1, available online).collected at the main gate forest and last collected in July 1981.Makadara and Longo-Mwagandi forests:Elapsoidea nigra(Günther, 1888), IUCN Red List Endangered (EN), also present in Mukurumudzi Dam forest patch;Cnemaspis africana(Werner, 1895), not collected in the past;Philothamnus macrops(Boulenger, 1895), also present in Mukurumudzi Dam(dam-site and Maumba) and Gongoni Forest.Melanoseps pygymaeus(Broadley, 2006), present in Longo-Mwangadi,Makadara, Buda, Gongoni, and Kaya Kinondo forests.Holaspis laevis(Werner, 1895), present in Longo-Mwagandi, Gongoni,and Buda forests, an arboreal and agile species first recorded and collected in Kenya in October 2009 in the Kaya Jibana Forest in Kilifi (Malonza & Bauer, 2014).Lygodactylus broadleyi(Pasteur, 1995), present in Longo-Mwagandi, Makadara,Gongoni, Buda, Kaya Muhaka, and Kaya Kinondo forests, as well as the Miembeni Forest patch in Mukurumudzi Dam.Cordylus tropidosternum(Cope, 1869), collected in Makadara Forest, Kaya Kwale Forest, and Kaya Gandini Forest.Boulengerula changamwensis(Loveridge, 1932), IUCN Red List Endangered (EN), a soil burrow ing am phibian species present in Longo-Mwangandi, Makadara, and Buda forests, as well as Mukurumudzi Dam sites (Miembeni and Maumba forest patches).Gastropholis prasina(Werner, 1904), present in the Shimba Hills National Reserve in the Sheldrick Falls area, and recorded at the main gate forest and in Buda Forest station.Amphibian species that exhibit water-dependent breeding included:Leptopelis grandiceps(Ahl, 1929), IUCN Red List Vulnerable (VU), a forest dependent species only present in Mwele Forest stream spring; and reed frogsHyperolius rubrovermiculatus(Schiøtz, 1975) andAfrixalus sylvaticus(Schiøtz, 1974), both categorized as IUCN Red List Endangered (EN) and present in wetlands in the Shimba Hills National Reserve (e.g. Shimba Lodge, Mwadabara, Sheldrick Falls, and Mwele Forest stream), Gongoni Forest, Buda Forest,and Mukurumudzi Dam site wetlands.

The search continues to verify the status of historical records ofGastropholis vittata(Fischer, 1886),Bitis gabonica(Duméril& Bibroni, 1845), andHemidactylus modestus(Günther, 1894)in the Shimba Hills National Reserve and surrounding area(Spaw ls et al., 2002).

Species of conservation concern

We used the IUCN Red List of threatened species to identify species of conservation concern. In addition, we selected other species with a distribution range restricted to coastal forests and the Eastern Arc Mountains of East Africa that were either rare and/or associated with indigenous forests. The Makadara,Longo-Mwagandi, and Mwele forests in the Shimba Hills National Reserve were the specific forest sites where most species of conservation concern were recorded. The entire species list and distribution in different sites is given in SupplementaryTable 1 (available online). Makadara Forest species:Scolecomorphusvittatus(Boulenger, 1895), single specimen from the NMK Herpetology Collection;Callulina krefffti(Nieden, 1911), first collected in 1961 (Loader et al.,2010). Longo-Mwagandi Forest species:Prosymna semifasciata(Broad ley, 1995), photographed in September 2014;Kinyongia tenuis(Matschie, 1892), IUCN Red List Endangered (EN),

Shim ba Hills biogeographical assignment

The Shimba Hills have been historically categorized as part of the coastal forests of eastern Africa. However, below is a comparison of the species so far recorded in the Shimba Hills ecosystem that are endemic to the two different biogeographical zones.

Eastern Arc Mountains species: Currently there are seven typical Eastern Arc Mountains herpetofaunal species. However,the recorded Eastern Arc Mountain species has been increasing steadily in the last several decades. Initially, the species known from the Shimba Hills National Reserve only includedKinyongia tenuis(last collected in August 1981).Recent collections of this species and records of other Eastern Arc endem ics such as the snakesElapsoidea nigraandProsymna semifasciata,caecilianScolecomorphusvittatus,and frogsCallulinakrefftiandLeptopelis grandicepshave been made. In addition, there is also an early collection of a pygm y chameleon assignable toRhampholeon temporalis(Matschie,1892), but it has yet to be re-collected.

Coastal forest species: Including the endem icHyperolius rubrovermiculatusandAfrixalus sylvaticusandRieppeleon brevicaudatus(Matschie, 1892) species, 13 East African coastal forest endem ic species have been recorded in the Shimba Hills ecosystem. These includeHemidactylus barbouri(Loveridge, 1942),Hemidactylus mrimaensis(Malonza &Bauer, 2014),Lygodactylus mombasicus(Loveridge, 1935),Melanoseps pygmaeus,Lygosoma pembanum(Boettger, 1913),Lygodactylus broadleyi(Pasteur, 1995),Letheobia swahilica(Broadley & Wallach, 2007),Letheobia lumbriciformis(Peters,1874),Leptotyphlops macrops(Broadley & Wallach, 1996), andBoulengerula changamwensis. This biogeographical analysis of the Eastern Arc and coastal forests of the Shimba Hills species gives a ratio of 7:13.

DISCUSSION

The Shimba Hills stand out as the most reptile and amphibian species rich area in Kenya, particularly due to the endem ic and near-endem ic species. Undoubtedly, the Makadara, Longo-Mwagandi, and Mwele forests within the Shimba Hills National Reserve are key forest areas because they support all currently known rare and unique herpetofaunal species in this ecosystem. Outside the Shimba Hills National Reserve,Mukurumudzi Dam is the best amphibian habitat. Following the creation of the dam, the ongoing habitat rehabilitation and protection efforts have created new habitats for species, while former areas have improved in quality. This agrees with other studies elsewhere on the effects of large water dam s on biodiversity (McAllister et al., 2000). Although the Gongoni,Buda, and Kaya forests are highly disturbed and degraded,they also support some unique forest-associated species. This concurs with past findings in the Kitobo Forest in south-eastern Kenya, which was found to act as a refuge for several threatened forest species despite being surrounded by intensive comm unity settlement and agriculture (Malonza et al.,2011).

Using reptiles and amphibians as zoogeographical indicators,there was no clear support of the hypothesis that the Shimba Hills area is biogeographically a typical coastal forest. Our results showed that the Shimba Hills are at a biogeographical crossroads, supporting a good number of typically Eastern Arc as well as East African coastal forest species (Burgess et al.,2007). This observation was also noted in a brief analysis of the Shimba Hills am phibians by Bwong et al. (2014). Given that most of the Eastern Arc endem ics are rare and recent species records, it is likely that their numbers might increase with additional sam pling. In addition, further analysis of all form s of biodiversity (flora and fauna), including molecular taxonomy, is needed to clearly understand the biogeographic history of the Shimba Hills biodiversity.

W ith their low undulating hills and plateaus, unlike the ordinary coastal low land forests but like the Eastern Arc Mountains, the Shimba Hills present the first break or barrier to the moist rainfall winds from the Indian Ocean maintaining a stable montane forest environment. The proxim ity of the Shimba Hills to the Indian Ocean has resulted in a stable climate, leading to its diverse and unique herpetofauna. The hilly topography (up to ~430 m) differentiates the Shimba Hills from typical low land coastal forests like Arabuko-Sokoke.Furthermore, although the hum id montane forests are like islands that promote speciation similar to that observed in the Eastern Arc Mountains, most of the species found in the Shimba Hills occur at much lower elevations than typically recorded elsewhere in their range. For example, the Usambara garter snake (Elapsiodea nigra) has been recorded below 100 m in the Mukurumudzi Dam basin, whereas in Tanzania it is known from 300–2 000 m (Menegon et al., 2008; Spaw ls et al.,2002).

Biogeographically, the Shimba Hills are an important reptile and am phibian area supporting unique and diverse species of conservation concern. While substantial work has been covered in this study, more extensive and intensive fieldwork using all standard her pet of aunal sampling methods covering different seasons and habitat types is highly recommended.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no com peting interests.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

P.K.M, D.M.M., and J.O.N. did all the fieldwork for the study. P.K.M. wrote the manuscript and did data analysis with other authors’ inputs. G.J.organized for all the field logistics to collect field data and edited the manuscript. P.K.M. revised the m anuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Kenya Wild life Service and Kenya Forest Service-Kwale for permission to do her petological work in protected areas under their jurisdiction and for providing rangers for security. We are very grateful to the Kaya elders for allowing us to work in the Kaya forests. We are also grateful for the logistical and financial support provided by Base Titanium Ltd.

Bates MF, Tolley KA, Edwards S, Davids Z, Da Silva JM, Branch WR. 2013.A molecular phylogeny of the African plated lizards, genusGerrhosaurusWiegmann, 1828 (Squamata: Gerrhosauridae), with the description of two new genera.Zootaxa,3750(5): 465–493.

Bell KE, Donnelly MA. 2006. Influence of forest fragmentation on community structure of frogs and lizards in northeastern Costa Rica.Conservation Biology,20(6): 1750–1760.

Broad ley DG, Whiting AS, Bauer AM. 2006. A revision of the East African species ofMelanosepsBoulenger (Sauria: Scincidae: Feylininae).African Journal of Herpetology,55(2): 95–112.

Broadley DG, Wallach V. 2007a. A revision of the genusLeptotyphlopsin northeastern Africa and southwestern Arabia (Serpentes: Lep totyphlopidae).Zootaxa,1408(1): 1–78.

Broad ley DG, Wa llach V. 2007b. A review of east and centra l African species ofLetheobiaCope, revived from the synonym y ofRhinotyphlopsFitzinger, with descriptions of five new species (Serpentes: Typhlopidae).Zootaxa,1515: 31–68.

Broad ley DG, Wallach V. 2009. A review of the eastern and southern African blind-snakes (Serpentes: Typhlopidae), excludingLetheobiaCope,w ith the description of two new genera and a new species.Zootaxa,2255:1–100.

Burgess ND, Muir C. 1994. Coastal Forests of Eastern Africa: Biodiversity and Conservation. UK: The Society for Environmental Exploration/Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

Burgess ND, Butynski TM, Cordeiro NJ, Doggart NH, Fjeldså J, Howell KM,Kilaham a FB, Loader SP, Lovett JC, Mbilinyi B, Menegon M, Moyer DC,Nashanda E, Perkin A, Rovero F, Stanley WT, Stuart SN. 2007. The biological im portance of the Eastern Arc mountains of Tanzania and Kenya.Biological Conservation,134(2):209–231.

Bwong BA, Malonza PK, Wasonga DV, Nyam ache JO, Nagel P, Loader SP.2014. At a biogeographical crossroads: amphibian paradise in Shimba hills of Kenya.FrogLog,22(3): 72–73.

Bwong BA, Nyamache JO, Malonza PK, Wasonga DV, Ngwava JM, Barrat CD, Nagel P, Loader SP. 2017. Am phibian diversity in Shimba Hills National Reserve, Kenya: a comprehensive list of specimens and species.East African Journal of Natural History,106(1). (in press)

Channing A, Hillers A, Lötters S, Röde l MO, Schick S, Conradie W, Rödder D, Mercurio V, Wagner P, Dehling JM, Du Preez LH, Kielgast J, Burger M.2013. Taxonomy of the super-crypticHyperolius nasutusgroup of long reed frogs of Africa (Anura: Hypero liidae), with descriptions of six new species.Zootaxa,3620(3): 301–350.

Channing A, Howell KM. 2006.Amphibians of East Africa. Ithaca and Frankfurt: Cornell University Press and Edition Chimaira Press.

Chira M. 1993. Ecological Study of Herpetofauna in the Arabuko-Sokoke and Gede Coastal Forests of Kenya. Master Thesis, University of Nairobi,Kenya, p88.

Corn PS. 1994. Straight-line drift fences and pitfa ll traps.In: Heyer WR,Donnelly MA, McDiarm id MRW, Hayek LAC, Foster MS. Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Am phibians.Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 109–117.

Drewes RC. 1992. Amphibian species of the Gedi and Arabuko Sokoke Forests, Kenya. California, USA: California Academ y of Sciences, p32.

Githitho AN. 2003. The sacred mijikenda kaya forests of coastal Kenya and biodiversity conservation.In: UNESCO, 2003. Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Importance of Sacred Natural Sites for Biodiversity Conservation Held in Kunming and Xishuangbanna Biosphere Reserve, 27–45.

Hedges SB. 2014. The high-level classification of skinks (Reptilia,Squam ata, Scincom orpha).Zootaxa,3765(4): 317–338.

Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarm id RW, Hayek LAC, Foster MS. 1994.Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Am phibians. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Howell KM. 1993. Herpetofauna of the eastern African forests.In: Lovett JC,Wasser SK. Biogeography and Ecology of the Rain Forests of Eastern Africa. Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karns DR. 1986. Fie ld Herpetology: Methods for the study of Amphibians and Reptiles in Minnesota.Occasional Paper18, James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota.

Lanza B, Broad ley DG. 2014. A review of the genusGonionotophisin northeastern Africa (Squamata: Lam p rophiidae).Acta Herpetologica,9(1): 89–97.Loader SP, Gower DJ, Nga lason W, Menegon M. 2010. Three new species ofCallulina(Am phibia: Anura: Brevicipitidae) high light local endem ism and conservation p light of Africa’s Eastern Arc forests.Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society,160(3): 496–514.

Lötters S, Wagner P, Bwong BA, Schick S, Malonza PK, Muchai V,Wasonga DV, Veith M. 2007. A Fie ld Guide to the Am phibians and Reptiles of the Kakam ega Forest. Nairobi and Mainz: National Museum s of Kenya and University of Mainz, Germany).

Lovett JC. 1990. Classification and status of the moist forests of Tanzanian.Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg,23A: 287–300.

Ma lonza PK, Lötters S, Measey GJ. 2010. The m ontane forest associated am phibian species of the Taita Hills, Kenya.Journal of East African Natural History,99(1): 47–63.

Malonza PK, Bwong BA, Muchai V. 2011. Kitobo Forest of Kenya, a unique hotspot of herpetofaunal diversity.Acta Herpetologica,6(2):149–160.

Malonza PK, Veith M. 2012. Am phibian community along elevational and habitat disturbance gradients in the Taita Hills, Kenya.Herpetotropicos,7(1–2): 7–16.

Malonza PK, Bauer AM. 2014. A new species of arboreal forest-dwelling gecko (Hemidactylus: Squamata: Gekkonidae) from coastal Kenya, East Africa.Zootaxa,3786(2): 192–200.

Malonza PK, Müller H. 2004. A rediscovery after two decades: the Changamwe low land caecilianBoulengerula changamwensisLoveridge,1932(Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae).Journal of East Africa Natural History,93(1): 57–61.

Malonza PKW. 2008. Amphibian Biodiversity in Taita Hills, Kenya. Ph.D.thesis, Johannes-Gutenberg University-Mainz, Germany, p158.

McAllister DE, Craig JF, Davidson N, Delany S, Seddon M. 2000.Biodiversity Impacts of Large Dam s. Background paper Nr. 1 prepared for IUCN/UNEP/WCD, p47.

Menegon M, Doggart N, Owen N. 2008. The Nguru mountains of Tanzania,an outstanding hotspot of herpetofaunal diversity.Acta Herpetologica,3(2):107–127.

Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Ho ffm an M, Pilgrim JD, Brooks TM, Mittermeier CG,Lamoreux JL, da Fonseca GAB. 2005. Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX.

Monge-Nájera J 2008. Ecological biogeography: a review with emphasis on conservation and the neutral model.Gayana,72(1):102–112.

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000.Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Nature,403(6772): 853–858.

Myers N. 2003. Biodiversity hotspots revisited.BioScience,53(10): 916–917.

Newmark WD. 2002. Conserving Biodiversity in East African Forests: A Study of the Eastern Arc Mountains. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Nussbaum RA, Hinkel H. 1994. Revision of east African caecilians of the generaAfrocaeciliataylor andBoulengerulatornier (Am phibia:Gymnophiona: Caeciliaidae).Ibid,3: 750–760.

Ohler A, Dubois A. 2016. The identity of the South African toadSclerophrys capensisTschudi, 1838 (Amphibia, Anura).PeerJ,4: e1553, doi:10.7717/peerj.1553.

Pickersgill M. 2005. The taxonom y and ethology of theAfrixalus stuhlmannicom p lex (Anura: Hyperoliidae).Steenstrupia,29(1): 1–38.

Pickersgill M. 2007. Frog search: results of expeditions to southern and eastern Africa from 1993–1999. Frankfurt am Main: Lanesboro, Minn.:Edition Chimaira; Zoo Book Sales, Serpent's Tale [U.S. distributor], p574.

Pineda E, Halffter G. 2004. Species diversity and habitat fragmentation:frogs in a tropical montane landscape in Mexico.Biological Conservation,117(5): 499–508.

Röll B. 2000. Two sympatricLygodactylusspecies in coastal areas of Eastern Africa (Reptilia: Gekkonidae).Bonner Zoologische Monographien,46:189–198.

Röll B. 2004.Lygodactylus luteopicturatusPasteur, 1965 (1964) ein Synonym vonLygodactylus picturatus(Peters, 1870) (Sauria: Gekkonidae).Sauria,26(1):31–35.

Schick S, Veith M, Lötters S. 2005. Distribution patterns of amphibians from the Kakamega forest, Kenya.African Journal of Herpetology,54(2): 185–190.

Schiøtz A. 1999. Tree Frogs of Africa. Germany: Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main.

Scott E, Visser JD, Yetm an CA, O liver L, Broad ley DG. 2013.Revalidation ofPyxicephalusangusticepsParry, 1982 (Anura: Natatanura:Pyxicephalidae), a bullfrog endem ic to the low lands of eastern Africa.Zootaxa,3599: 201–228.

Sloan S Jenkins CN, Joppa LN, Gaveau DLA, Laurance WF. 2014.Remaining natura l vegetation in the g loba l biodiversity hotspots.Biological Conservation,177: 12–24.

Spaw ls S, Howell K, Drewes R, Ashe J. 2002. A Field Guide to the Reptiles of East Africa. Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, W ichmann MC, Schwager M,Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the im portance of keystone structures.Journal of Biogeography,31(1): 79–92.

Wagner P, Böhme W. 2007. Herpetofauna kakamegensis-the am phibians and reptiles of Kakamega forest, western Kenya.Bonner Zoologische Beiträge,55(2): 123–150.

Wagner P, Köhler J, Schm itz A, Böhme W. 2008. The biogeographical assignm ent of a west Kenyan rain forest remnant: further evidence from analysis of its reptile fauna.Journal of Biogeography,35(8): 1349–1361.

Whittaker RJ, Araújo MB, Jepson P, Lad le RJ, Watson JEM, W illis KJ. 2005.Conservation Biogeography: assessment and p rospect.Diversity and Distributions,11(1): 3–23.