子宫内膜异位症患者实施腹腔镜手术的术前、术中和术后的护理探究
2015-08-29方迎春
方迎春
[摘要] 目的 探讨子宫内膜异位症患者实施腹腔镜手术的术前、术中和术后的护理。方法 选取该院自2010年12月—2014年12月以来收治的91例子宫内膜异位症患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,随机分为对照组(39例)与观察组(52例),对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予术前、术中及术后精心护理,比较两组护理效果。结果 观察组住院时间(4.12±1.02)d明显低于对照组(7.69±1.03)(t=16.254,P=0.001<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率(9.62%)、护理满意度(92.31%)与对照组(25.64%、76.92%)相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜异位症时,给予术前、术中及术后护理效果显著。
[关键词] 子宫内膜异位症;腹腔镜;围术期护理;临床效果
[中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)06(c)-0165-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative nursing for endometriosis patients with laparoscopic surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 91 cases with endometriosis admitted in our hospital from December 2010 to December 2014. The patients were randomly divided into the control group(39 cases) and the observation group(52 cases). The control group were treated by the conventional nursing, and the observation group were treated by the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative careful nursing. And the nursing efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had much shorter length of stay [(4.12±1.02)d vs (7.69±1.03)d] (t=16.254, P=0.001<0.05). The incidence of complications was lower in the observation group than that in the control group(9.62% vs 25.64%) (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction was higher in the observation group than that in the control group(92.31% vs 76.92%) (P<0.05). Conclusion For endometriosis treated by laparoscopic surgery, the effect of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative nursing is significant.
[Key words] Endometriosis; Laparoscope; Perioperative nursing; Clinical effect
腹腔镜手术具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少的优点,使其在妇科疾病治疗中得到广泛应用。为提高子宫内膜异位症患者腹腔镜手术治疗效果,也需要对其围术期实施有效的临床护理干预,其中术前、术中及术后精心护理在手术患者中的应用,能够取得良好的临床效果。该研究为了探讨子宫内膜异位症患者实施腹腔镜手术的围术期护理及效果,特选取2010年12月—2014年12月该院收治的子宫内膜异位症患者作为该研究对象,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
整群选取该院自2010年12月—2014年12月以来收治的子宫内膜异位症患者91例,所有患者经诊断均符合相关诊断标准。均了解研究相关情况,并签署知情同意书,自愿参与研究。随机将其分为对照组(39例)和观察组(52例),对照组:年龄(22~45)岁,平均年龄(31.02±4.36)岁;病程(2~31)个月,平均病程(13.2±1.4)个月。观察组:年龄(20~46)岁,平均年龄(32.41±3.48)岁;病程(3~31)个月,平均病程(14.12±2.0)个月。比较两组患者的各项临床资料,可得均P>0.05,即说明两组患者的一般资料具有均衡性。……p>
